--> USGS Assessment of Undiscovered, Technically Recoverable Oil and Natural Gas Resources of the Lower Paleogene Midway and Wilcox Groups, and Carrizo Sand, Claiborne Group, Onshore Gulf of Mexico Basin, U.S.A., Peter D. Warwick, Article #10179

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

 Click to view article in PDF format (29.7 MB)

Or right click to download.

 

 

PSUSGS Assessment of Undiscovered, Technically Recoverable Oil and Natural Gas Resources of the Lower Paleogene Midway and Wilcox Groups, and Carrizo Sand, Claiborne Group, Onshore Gulf of Mexico Basin, U.S.A.*

 

Peter D. Warwick1

 

Search and Discovery Article #10179 (2009)

Posted April 8, 2009

 

*This report contains the abstract, figures, and references presented April 22, 2008, in a poster session at AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas.

Author’s note: No attempt has been made herein to provide other than the bare minimum of text to support each of the figures as presented at the AAPG meeting. This same material currently is in manuscript format in internal peer review at the U.S. Geological Survey, where it will ultimately be presented in a formal-series publication. Readers of the current presentation are encouraged to contact the author via email with their questions and comments.

 

1Eastern Energy Resources Team, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, MS 956, Reston, VA  20192 ( [email protected] )

 

 

Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recently conducted an assessment of the undiscovered, technically recoverable oil and gas potential of Tertiary strata underlying the onshore areas and State waters of the northern Gulf of Mexico coastal region. The assessment was based on a number of geologic elements including an evaluation of hydrocarbon source rocks, the availability of suitable reservoir rocks, and the presence of hydrocarbon traps in an Upper Jurassic-Cretaceous-Tertiary Composite Total Petroleum System (TPS) defined for the region by the USGS. Five assessment units (AUs) were defined for the Midway (Paleocene) and Wilcox (Paleocene-Eocene) Groups, and the Carrizo Sand of the Claiborne Group (Eocene) interval: (1) the Wilcox Stable Shelf Oil and Gas AU; (2) the Wilcox Expanded Fault Zone Gas and Oil AU; (3) the Wilcox Slope and Basin Floor Gas AU; (4) the Wilcox-Lobo Slide Block Gas AU; and (5) the Wilcox Mississippi Embayment AU (not quantitatively assessed).

 

The USGS assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources for the Midway-Wilcox-Carrizo interval resulted in estimated mean values of 110 million barrels of oil, 36.9 trillion cubic feet of gas, and 639 million barrels of natural gas liquids (NGL) in the four assessed units. The undiscovered oil resources are almost evenly divided between fluvial-deltaic sandstone reservoirs within the Wilcox Stable Shelf (54 MMBO) and deltaic sandstone reservoirs of the Expanded Fault Zone (52 MMBO) AUs. Greater than 70 percent of the undiscovered gas and 66 percent of the NGL are estimated to be in deep (13,000 to 30,000 ft), unexplored distal deltaic and slope sandstone reservoirs within the Wilcox Slope and Basin Floor Gas AU.

 

 

Overview of Current USGS National Assessment of Oil and Gas Activities

 

Goal of the National Assessment

The primary goal of the USGS National Oil and Gas Assessment (NOGA) project is to develop geologically based estimates of the quantities of oil and gas that have the potential to be added to proved reserves in the United States.

 

Objectives of the National Assessment:

The current objectives of the USGS National Oil and Gas Assessment project are to:

·         Assess the 30 priority basins that contain approximately 96% of the resources; a map showing the current status of the NOGA assessments can be found at: http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/oilgas/noga/ (accessed November 6, 2008).

·         Define petroleum systems within the basins

·         Define geologically based assessment units (AU)

·         Assess both conventional and continuous resources

 

A summary of the current USGS NOGA results can be found on Figures 1a, 1b, 1c, and 1d .

 

 

Figures 1a-1d

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uOverview

uGoal

uObjectives

uFigures 1a-1d

uMethodology

uFigures 2-11

uResults

uFigures 12-21

uConclusions

uAcknowledgments

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fig01a

Figure 1a. Status of USGS conventional gas assessments in 2007. Source: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/graphic/2007/total_gas_mean_07.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009)

fig01b

Figure 1b. Status of USGS conventional oil assessments in 2008.

Source: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/graphic/2008/total_oil_mean_08.pdf

(accessed March 19, 2009)

fig01c

Figure 1c. Status of USGS continuous oil assessments in 2007.

Source: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/graphic/2007/mean_cont_oil_07.pdf

(accessed March 19, 2009)

fig01d

Figure 1d. Status of USGS continuous gas assessments in 2007.

Source: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/graphic/2007/mean_cont_includ_cbm_07.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009)

 


Methodology

 

The methodology used for the Gulf Coast conventional AUs follows that described in Klett et al. (2005), Schmoker and Klett (2005), and Charpentier and Klett (2005). The methodology used for the Gulf Coast continuous assessment units is described in Cook (2005), Crovelli (2005), Schmoker (2005), and Klett and Schmoker (2005). Peer reviews of the USGS oil and gas assessment methodology, as well as links to the above references, can be found at the following web address: http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/oilgas/noga/methodology.html (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Examples of conventional and continuous hydrocarbon accumulations used in U.S. Geological Survey assessments are shown on Figure 2.

 

Figures 2-11

fig02

Figure 2. Examples of conventional and continuous hydrocarbon accumulations used in USGS assessments. From Charpentier and Ahlbrandt (2003).

fig03

Figure 3. Major structural features of the northern onshore portion of the Gulf of Mexico basin. LA = Louisiana; (modified from Frezon et al., 1988; Ewing, 1991a; Ewing and Lopez, 1991; Salvador, 1991; and Warwick et al., 2007a).

fig04

Figure 4. Generalized stratigraphic section of the northern Gulf of Mexico coastal plain showing gas (triangles) and oil (circles) occurrences and potential source rocks (boxes and stars). Arrows along the right side indicate major source rock intervals. L. = Lower; Mid. = Middle; Up. = Upper; Tria. = Triassic; Pal. = Paleocene; Plei. = Pleistocene;

Holo. = Holocene; Quat. = Quaternary; vertical lines = unconformity; wavy line = disconformity; jagged line = interfingering; dashed line = uncertain (modified after Salvador and Quezada Muneton, 1991; Nehring, 1991; Palmer and Geissman, 1999; Humble Geochemical Services et al., 2002; and Warwick et al., 2007a).

fig05

Figure 5. Interpreted petroleum systems map of the northern Gulf of Mexico region. “Intermediate” denotes depositional environments that are intermediate between marine and terrestrial (after Wenger et al., 1994; Hood et al., 2002; and Warwick et al., 2007a).

fig06

Figure 6. Upper Jurassic-Cretaceous-Tertiary Composite Total Petroleum System (TPS) for the Gulf of Mexico basin. The letters on this Figure (A-O) refer to the notes above on how the TPS boundary was drawn. From Warwick et al. (2007a).


fig07

Figure 7. Generalized cross section showing Tertiary expansion zones across the south Texas Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain (modified from Ewing, 1991b; and Warwick et al., 2007a). L. = Lower; U. = Upper; Mid. = Middle; Mio. = Miocene.

fig08

Figure 8. Model used to define assessment units in the USGS assessment of Tertiary strata in Gulf of Mexico onshore and State water areas. For the Blue Stratigraphic Unit, Assessment Unit (AU) 1 is the stable shelf structural area; AU 2 defines the main unit expansion and thickening zone; and AU 3 comprises sediments deposited in slope and basin floor depositional environments. After Warwick et al. (2007a).   

 

fig09

Figure 9. Structure contour map for the top of the Wilcox Group. The map is based on more than 42,000 wells with Wilcox Group top picks in the IHS data base (IHS Energy Group, 2005). Structure contours have been extended to the coastal areas by using control points based on Wilcox top depths from regional cross sections and seismic lines (Ewing, 1991a; Salvador and and Quezada Muneton, 1991). The contours have been smoothed to remove the effect of uplifts associated with salt structures.

fig10

Figure 10. Generalized Wilcox Group thickness map (modified from Barker et al., 2000).

fig11  

Figure 11. Modeled thermal maturity (%Ro, vitrinite reflectance) for the top of the Wilcox Group. Ro was calculated using the Wilcox surface elevation (Figure 9) and more than 450 values of unpublished USGS Wilcox %Ro. Wilcox vitrinite reflectance values range from about 0.3 %Ro updip, near the outcrop, to more than 2.4 %Ro at depths greater than 24,000 ft in south Texas (after Warwick, 2006).

 

Results

 

A summary of the Gulf of Mexico basin geology, stratigraphy, and petroleum systems can be found on Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. A geologic model used to help define assessment units for the Lower Paleogene Assessment interval (Midway-Wilcox-Carrizo Sand) is shown on Figure 8. Maps showing Wilcox structure, thickness, and estimated thermal maturities are shown on Figures 9, 10, and 11. Details of the various Lower Paleogene assessment units are shown on Figures 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19. Numerical results of the Lower Paleogene Assessment interval are shown on Figure 20 . A comparison of the Tertiary assessment intervals for the Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain is shown on Figure 21 .

 

Figures 12-21

fig12

Figure 12. Assessment Unit boundaries for the Midway-Wilcox-Carrizo (Paleocene-Eocene) stratigraphic intervals (see Figure 4). The USGS Region 6 Province boundaries (heavy black lines) are from the USGS National Oil and Gas Resource Assessment Team (1995).

fig13

Figure 13. Wilcox Stable Shelf AU, showing oil and gas fields. Largest oil and gas accumulations are shown. Data from Warwick et al. (1997); Nehring Associates, Inc. (2006); Warwick et al. (2007a); and T.R. Klett, USGS, written personal communication (2006).

fig14

Figure 14. Wilcox Expanded Fault Zone AU, showing oil and gas fields. Largest oil and gas accumulations are shown. Data from Warwick et al. (1997); Nehring Associates, Inc. (2006); Warwick et al. (2007a); and T.R. Klett, USGS, written personal communication (2006).

fig15

Figure 15. Wilcox-Lobo Slide Block Gas AU, showing oil and gas fields. Largest oil and gas accumulations are shown. Data from Warwick et al. (1997); Nehring Associates, Inc. (2006); Warwick et al. (2007a); and T.R. Klett, USGS, written personal communication (2006).

fig16  

Figure 16. Wilcox Slope and Basin Floor Gas AU, showing gas fields. Largest gas accumulations are shown. Data from Warwick et al. (1997); Nehring Associates, Inc. (2006); Warwick et al. (2007a); and T.R. Klett, USGS, written personal communication (2006).

fig17  

Figure 17. Plots showing size of grown oil and gas accumulations (fields) relative to the discovery year for the Wilcox Stable Shelf Oil and Gas Assessment Unit 50470116. Data from Nehring Associates, Inc. (2006); and T.R. Klett, USGS, written personal communication (2006).

fig18  

Figure 18. Plots showing size of grown oil and gas accumulations (fields) relative to the discovery year for the Wilcox Expanded Fault Zone Gas and Oil Assessment Unit 50470117. Data from Nehring Associates, Inc. (2006); and T.R. Klett, USGS, written personal communication (2006).

fig19  

Figure 19. Plots showing size of grown oil and gas accumulations (fields) relative to the discovery year for the Wilcox-Lobo Slide Block Gas Assessment Unit 50470119. Data from Nehring Associates, Inc. (2006); and T.R. Klett, USGS, written personal communication (2006).

fig20

Figure 20. Assessment results for the Lower Paleogene Midway and Wilcox Groups, and the Carrizo Sand, Claiborne Group. Adapted from Dubiel et al. (2007).

fig21  

Figure 21. USGS Gulf Coast assessment results for undiscovered, technically recoverable oil, gas, and NGL (natural gas liquids). MMBOE = million barrels of oil equivalent. Percentages of the total 22,689 MMBOE by major assessment intervals are shown. (Adapted from Dubiel et al. (2007).

 

Conclusions

 

This report presents a review of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 2007 assessment of the undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in Midway-Wilcox-Carrizo Sand strata (Paleocene-Eocene) underlying the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain and State waters. Numerical results of the assessment are presented in Figure 20 and in Dubiel et al. (2007) and Warwick et al. (2007b). For purposes of the assessment, an Upper Jurassic-Cretaceous-Tertiary total petroleum system (TPS) was defined for the Gulf of Mexico basin (Figure 6). Five assessment units (AUs) were defined for the Midway (Paleocene) and Wilcox (Paleocene-Eocene) Groups, and the Carrizo Sand of the Claiborne Group (Eocene) interval: (1) the Wilcox Stable Shelf Oil and Gas AU; (2) the Wilcox Expanded Fault Zone Gas and Oil AU; the (3) Wilcox Slope and Basin Floor Gas AU; (4) the Wilcox-Lobo Slide Block Gas AU; and (5) the Wilcox Mississippi Embayment AU (not quantitatively assessed) (Figure 12).

 

A generalized structural and stratigraphic model for Paleogene strata was developed to help define a generic updip, stable shelf AU; a middip, expansion (extension) zone AU; and a downdip, slope and basin floor AU for each assessed stratigraphic interval (Figure 8). A significant controlling factor for the location of the middip expansion zone AU is the location of underlying, stratigraphically older shelf margins. Using this geology-based assessment methodology, the USGS estimated a mean of 36.9 trillion cubic feet of undiscovered natural gas, a mean of 110 million barrels of undiscovered oil, and a mean of 639 million barrels of undiscovered natural gas liquids in onshore lands and State waters of the Gulf Coast.

 

Acknowledgments

 

The author wishes to thank all members of the U.S. Geological Survey Gulf Coast Tertiary assessment team for their contributions to this paper. In addition, discussions with staff members of the Minerals Management Service Gulf of Mexico Region, Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality Office of Geology, Louisiana Geological Survey, and The University of Texas at Austin Bureau of Economic Geology greatly contributed to the concepts presented in this paper.

 

As noted above, this report contains the abstract, figures, and references presented April 22, 2008, in a poster session at the AAPG Annual Convention in San Antonio, Texas. No attempt has been made herein to provide other than the bare minimum of text to support each of the figures as presented at the AAPG Meeting. This same material currently is in manuscript format in internal peer review at the U.S. Geological Survey, where it will ultimately be presented in a formal-series publication. Readers of the current presentation are encouraged to contact the author via email with their questions and comments.

 

References

 

Barker, C.E., L.R.H. Biewick, P.D. Warwick, and J.R. SanFilipo, 2000, Preliminary Gulf Coast coalbed methane exploration maps - depth to Wilcox, apparent Wilcox thickness and vitrinite reflectance: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 00-113, 2 sheets.

 

Charpentier, R.R., and T.S. Ahlbrandt, 2003, Petroleum (oil and gas) geology and resources, in De Vivo, Benedetto, Grasemann, Bernhard, and Stüwe, Kurt eds., Geology, Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), Developed under the Auspices of the UNESCO, EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK, v. 5, p. 31-53: http://www.eolss.net (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Charpentier, R.R., and T.R. Klett, 2005, A Monte Carlo simulation method for the assessment of undiscovered, conventional oil and gas, in USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team, compilers, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the southwestern Wyoming province, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D, chapter 21, 5 p., CD-ROM: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/text/CH_21.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Condon, S.M., and T.S. Dyman, 2006, 2003 geologic assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in the Upper Cretaceous Navarro and Taylor Groups, Western Gulf Province, Texas: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-H, Chapter 2, 42 p., CD-ROM: http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-069/dds-069-h/ (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Cook, Troy, 2005, Calculation of estimated ultimate recovery (EUR) for wells in continuous-type oil and gas accumulations, in USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team, compilers, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the southwestern Wyoming province, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D, chapter 23, 6 p., CD-ROM:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-069/dds-069-d/REPORTS/69_D_CH_23.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Crovelli, R.A., 2005, Analytic resource assessment method for continuous petroleum accumulations—the ACCESS assessment method, in USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team, compilers, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the southwestern Wyoming province, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D, chapter 22, 10 p., CD-ROM:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-069/dds-069-d/REPORTS/69_D_CH_22.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Dubiel R.F., J.K. Pitman, O.N. Pearson, S.M. Condon, P.D. Warwick, A.W. Karlsen, J.L. Coleman, P.C. Hackley, D.O. Hayba, S.M. Swanson, R.R. Charpentier, T.A. Cook, T.R. Klett, R.M Pollastro, and C.J. Schenk, 2007, Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources in Tertiary strata and Cretaceous-Tertiary coalbed gas of the Gulf Coast: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-2007-3066, 4 p.: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2007/3066/ (accessed March19, 2009).

 

Eguiluz de Antuñano, S., 2001, Geologic evolution and gas resources of the Sabinas Basin in northeastern Mexico, in C. Bartolini, R.T. Buffler, and A. Cantú-Chapa, eds., The western Gulf of Mexico Basin: Tectonics, sedimentary basins, and petroleum systems: AAPG Memoir 75, p. 241-270.

 

Ewing, T.E., 1991a, Structural framework, in A. Salvador, ed., The Gulf of Mexico Basin: GSA, The Geology of North America, v. J, p. 31-52.

 

Ewing, T.E., 1991b, The tectonic framework of Texas - text to accompany The tectonic map of Texas: The University of Texas at Austin Bureau of Economic Geology, Publication SM0001, 36 p.

 

Ewing, T.E., and R.F. Lopez, 1991, Principal structural features, Gulf of Mexico basin, in A. Salvador, ed., The Gulf of Mexico Basin: The Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, v. J, plate 2, 1 sheet.

 

French, C.D., and C.J. Schenk, 2004, Map showing geology, oil and gas fields, and geologic provinces of the Caribbean Region: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-470-K, 1 sheet, CD-ROM:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/ofr-97-470/OF97-470K/ (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

French, C.D., and C.J. Schenk, 2005, Map showing the geology, oil and gas fields, and geologic provinces of the Gulf of Mexico Region: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-470-L, 1 sheet, CD-ROM:

http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/ofr-97-470/OF97-470L/ (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Frezon, S.E., T.M. Finn (comp.), and K.L. Varnes (ed.), 1988, Map of sedimentary basins in the conterminous United States: U.S. Geological Survey Oil and Gas Investigation Map OM-223, 1 sheet, scale: 1:5,000,000.

 

Hood, K.C., L.M. Wenger, O.P. Gross, and S.C. Harrison, 2002, Hydrocarbon systems analysis of the northern gulf of Mexico - delineation of hydrocarbon migration pathways using seeps and seismic imaging, in D. Schumacher and L.A. LeSchack, eds., Applications of geochemistry, magnetics, and remote sensing: AAPG Studies in Geology no. 48 and SEG Geophysical Reference Series no. 11, p. 25-40.

 

Humble Geochemical Services, Geochemical and Environmental Research Group, BEICIP, Inc, Brame Geosciences, 2002, Petroleum systems of the Gulf of Mexico - prediction of hydrocarbon charge, GOM source rock and oil asphaltene kinetics in Temispack 2D basin modeling, Proposal 2002, 16 p.: http://www.humble-inc.com/gom2001.htm (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

IHS Energy Group, 2005 [includes data current as of December, 2005], PI/Dwights Plus US Well Data: Englewood, CO, IHS Energy Group; database available from IHS Energy Group, 15 Inverness Way East, D205, Englewood, CO 80112, U.S.A.

James, K.H., 2004, A simple synthesis of Caribbean geology: AAPG Search and Discovery, Article no. 30026, 5 p.: http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2004/james/index.htm (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Klett, T.R., and J.W. Schmoker, 2005, U.S. Geological Survey input-data form and operational procedure for the assessment of continuous petroleum accumulations, 2002, in USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team, compilers, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the southwestern Wyoming province, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D, chapter 18, 8 p., CD-ROM: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/text/CH_18.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Klett, T.R., J.W. Schmoker, and R.R. Charpentier, 2005, U.S. Geological Survey input-data form and operational procedure for the assessment of conventional petroleum accumulations, in USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team, compilers, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the southwestern Wyoming province, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D, chapter 20, 7 p., CD-ROM: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/text/CH_20.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Lüders, V., B. Horsfield, T. Kenkmann, B. Mingram, and A.Wittmann, 2003, Hydrocarbons and aqueous fluids in Cretaceous sediments of the ICDP-Chicxulub drill core Yax-1: Lunar and Planetary Science, v. 34, abstract no.1378, 2 p.: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2003/pdf/1378.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Nehring, R., 1991, Oil and gas resources, in A. Salvador, ed., The Gulf of Mexico Basin: The Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America, v. J, p. 445-494.

 

Nehring Associates, Inc., 2006 [includes data current as of December 31, 2004], The Significant oil and gas fields of the United States: Colorado Springs, CO: Nehring Associates, Inc.; database available from Nehring Associates, Inc., P.O. Box 1655 , Colorado Springs, CO 80901, U.S.A.

 

Palmer, A.R., and J. Geissman, compilers, 1999, 1999 geologic time scale: GSA product code CTS004, 1 p.: http://www.geosociety.org/science/timescale/timescl.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Rodriguez, R., J.R. Sanchez, S. Toucet, and G. Hernandez, 1995, Deep structure of the southern shelf of Cuba - new implications: AAPG Bulletin, v. 79, no. 13, p. 82.

 

Rosenfeld, J.H., 2003, Economic potential of the Yucatan block of Mexico, Guatemala, and Belize, in C. Bartolioni, R.T., Buffler, and J. Blickwede, eds., The Circum-Gulf of Mexico and the Caribbean - Hydrocarbon habitats, basin formation, and plate tectonics: AAPG Memoir 79, p. 340-348.

 

Salvador, A., 1991, Introduction, in A. Salvador, ed., The Gulf of Mexico Basin: GSA, The Geology of North America, v. J, p. 1-12.

 

Salvador, A., and J.M. Quezada Muneton, 1991, Stratigraphic correlation chart; Gulf of Mexico Basin, in A. Salvador, ed., The Gulf of Mexico Basin: GSA, The Geology of North America, v. J, plate 5, 1 sheet.

 

Schenk C.J., T.S. Ahlbrandt, R.R. Charpentier, M.E. Henry, T.R. Klett, R.M. Pollastro, and J.N. Weaver, 2005, Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources of the north Cuba basin, Cuba, 2004: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2005-3009, 2 p., CD-ROM: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2005/3009/ (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Schenk C.J., D.K. Higley, and L.B. Magoon, 2000, Region 6 assessment summary - Central and South America, in U.S. Geological Survey world petroleum assessment 2000 - Description and results: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-60, CD-ROM: http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/WEcont/regions/reg6/R6chap.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Schmoker, J.W., 2005, U.S. Geological Survey assessment concepts for continuous petroleum accumulations, in USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team, compilers, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the southwestern Wyoming province, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D, chapter 13, 7 p., CD-ROM: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/text/CH_13.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Schmoker, J.W., and T.R. Klett, 2005, U.S. Geological Survey assessment concepts for conventional petroleum accumulations, in USGS Southwestern Wyoming Province Assessment Team, compilers, Petroleum systems and geologic assessment of oil and gas in the southwestern Wyoming province, Wyoming, Colorado and Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D, chapter 19, 6 p., CD-ROM: http://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/text/CH_19.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Scott, R.J., 2003, The Maverick basin - new technology - new success, in N.C. Rosen ed., Structure and stratigraphy of south Texas and northeast Mexico, applications to exploration: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Foundation, and South Texas Geological Society, Houston, TX, April 11, 2003, p. 84-121, CD-ROM.

 

Schruben, P.G., R.E. Arndt, and W.J. Bawiek, compilers, display software by A. Russell and R.A. Ambroziak, 1998, Geology of the conterminous United States at 1:2,500,000 scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-11, Release 2, CD-ROM: http://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds11/ (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

U.S. Geological Survey National Oil and Gas Resource Assessment Team, 1995, 1995 National assessment of United States oil and gas resources: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1118, 20 p.: http://greenwood.cr.usgs.gov/energy/circ1118.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

USGS World Energy Assessment Team, 2000, Assessment Summary of the Pimienta-Tamabra Total Petroleum System 530501 as part of the 2000 World Petroleum Assessment, in U.S. Geological Survey world petroleum assessment 2000 - Description and results: U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-60, CD-ROM: http://energy.cr.usgs.gov/WEcont/regions/reg5/P5/tps/t530501.pdf (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Warwick, P.D., 2006, Thermal maturity of the Wilcox Group (Paleocene-Eocene) - A key to the Cenozoic petroleum systems of the northern Gulf of Mexico basin, USA: The Society for Organic Petrology, 23rd Annual Meeting, Program and Abstracts, Beijing, China, v. 23, p. 271-272.

 

Warwick, P.D., J.L. Coleman, P.C. Hackley, D.O. Hayba, A.W. Karlsen, E.L. Rowan, and S.M. Swanson, 2007a, USGS assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources in Paleogene strata of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico Coastal Plain and state waters, in Lorcan Kennan, James Pindell, and N.C. Rosen, eds., The Paleogene of the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Basins - Processes, events, and petroleum systems: SEPM Gulf Coast Section Foundation 27th Annual Research Conference, Houston, TX, December 2-5, 2007, p. 2-44. CD-ROM.

 

Warwick, P.D., R.R. Charpentier, T.A. Cook, T.R. Klett, R.M. Pollastro, and C.J. Schenk, 2007b, Assessment of Undiscovered Oil and Gas Resources in Cretaceous-Tertiary Coal Beds of the Gulf Coast Region, 2007: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-3039-07, 2 p.: http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2007/3039/ (accessed March 19, 2009).

 

Warwick, P.D., J.R. SanFilipo, S.S. Crowley, R.E. Thomas, and J. Fried, (compilers); J.K. Tully, (digital compiler), 1997, Map showing outcrop of the coal-bearing units and land use in the Gulf Coast coal region: U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 97-72, 1 sheet.

 

Wenger, L.M., L.R. Goodoff, O.P Gross, S.C. Harrison, and K.C. Hood, 1994, Northern Gulf of Mexico: An integrated approach to source, maturation, and migration: in N. Scheidermann, P. Cruz, and R. Sanchez, eds., Geological Aspects of Petroleum Systems, Proceedings, 1st Joint American Association of Petroleum Geologists/Asociación Mexicana de Geólogos Petróleos Research Conference, Mexico City, Mexico, p. 6.

 

Return to Top.

 

Copyright © AAPG. Serial rights given by author. For all other rights contact author directly.