GCReservoir Compartments Can Challenge Logic*
Search and Discovery Article #40593 (2010)
Posted August 20, 2010
*Adapted from the Geophysical Corner column, prepared by the author, in AAPG Explorer, August, 2010, and entitled “Compartments Can Challenge Logic”. Editor of Geophysical Corner is Bob A. Hardage ([email protected]). Managing Editor of AAPG Explorer is Vern Stefanic; Larry Nation is Communications Director.
1Bureau of Economic Geology, The University of Texas at Austin ([email protected])
All oil and gas reservoirs are compartmented to some degree. Lateral barriers to fluid flow sometimes exist because faults disrupt and vertically displace hydrocarbon-bearing units. More common causes of reservoir compartment boundaries are lateral and vertical flow barriers created by depositional processes and post-deposition diagenesis. In this article, we look at a reservoir compartment analysis done across a fluvial depositional system in South Texas. The story involves a bit of humor, provides a dose of soberness, and serves as a case history that illustrates the challenges of reservoir characterization.
Stratigraphers intended to use the logs from these two close-proximity wells to start a reservoir compartment model that could be extended across 3-D seismic image space. They had the options of constructing a reservoir compartment model in which unit A in well 175 connected to only unit B in well 202, or connected to only unit C, or connected to both units B and C.
The packers were then set to isolate unit C in well 202, the same pressure pulse was again applied in well 175, and the response in well 202 was again recorded. The test results are displayed as Figure 2 – as exhibited by the upper curve of this figure, no pressure variation was observed in either unit B or C.
The stratigraphers claimed the engineers could not do simple pressure-interference tests; the engineers claimed the stratigraphers could not correlate logs. The outcome of the debate was that the pressure test program was redone. The result after considerable time and cost was the repeat pressure-interference tests produced exactly the same curves shown on Figure 2. When these repeat test data confirmed the existence of an interwell compartment boundary between wells 175 and 202, friendly relations were restored to the project team and soberness began to pervade the study effort.
If a compartment boundary cannot be recognized with log data spaced only 200 feet apart, how can a compartment boundary be predicted using logs acquired in wells at greater separation distances, which is the common well spacing strategy used in reservoir exploitation? This sobering thought must be kept in mind when doing reservoir characterization studies.
Applying Seismic Technology
Thus, rather than relying on these 110-foot-bin seismic data for the analysis, a vertical seismic profile (VSP) was acquired that allowed the interwell space to be imaged with stacking bins having a width appropriate for resolving fine detail. The resulting VSP image is displayed as Figure 3.
One advantage of VSP imaging is that the distance between image traces can be adjusted to any desired value during data processing to enhance lateral resolution. In this instance the trace separation was arbitrarily set at 25 feet to produce eight image traces between wells 202 and 175, which allowed a more rigorous interpretation of interwell geology than could be achieved by relying on only two images traces from the 110-ft-bin 3-D seismic volumes used in this study.
These VSP data show a significant change in reflection waveshape for the thin-bed interval spanning units A, B and C that begins in the stacking-bin positioned approximately 150 feet (six image traces) away from well 202. This variation in reflection waveshape, indicated by the highlighted circle, is assumed to mark the compartment boundary between the two wells. Now when I get engaged in a reservoir characterization study, I look at the photo displayed as Figure 4 to keep focused on the complexity of reservoir compartmentalization.
Copyright © AAPG. Serial rights given by author. For all other rights contact author directly.