--> Is the Largest Petroleum Trap of the World in NW Turkey: Korudag Anticlinorium in the South Thrace Basin? by Samil Sen and Selin Yillar, ##70058 (2008).

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view article in PDF format.

 

PSIs the Largest Petroleum Trap of the World in NW Turkey: Korudag Anticlinorium in the South Thrace Basin?*

Samil Sen and Selin Yillar

 

Search and Discovery Article #70058 (2008)

Posted December 9, 2008

 

*Adapted from poster presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, TX, April 20-23, 2008.
 

 Geology Department, Istanbul Univeristy, Istanbul, Turkey ([email protected])

 

Abstract

The oil and gas-bearing Thrace Basin (NW Turkey) contains Upper Cretaceous to present sediments, reaching a maximum thickness of over 9000 m (Figures 1, 2, and 3). The Korudag Anticlinorium in the SW Thrace Basin was defined in the Korudag region; however, its extensions are not studied as yet. Our studies, based on geological, structural geological and seismic interpretation (Figures 4, 5, 6, and 7), suggest that the anticlinorium is approximately 300 km long and 40 km wide and extends between the Aegean Sea in the west and the area of the Sea of Marmara to the east. The Korudağ Anticlinorium has asymmetrical geometry represented by several folds along the south flank and one fold on the north flank. The anticlinorium was formed by effects of the Neotethyan subduction-accretion complex during late Early Miocene time. In addition, it was deformed to its present day structure by the Oldest Splay of the North Anatolian Fault and the Northern Branch of the North Anatolian Fault.

Presently the Ghawar Anticline located in Saudi Arabia, which is 280 km long and 30 km wide, is considered to be the largest petroleum trap in the world. The Ghawar Anticline is also a unified asymmetrical structure, which is steeper on the western flank and becomes more complex at depth where it comprises several en echelon horst blocks. It also comprises reverse faults and a minor component of right-lateral strike-slip. Therefore, the dimensions of the Korudag Anticlinorium are larger than that of Ghawar Anticline.

According to organic geochemical, oil and gas to source rock correlation and basin modeling studies (e.g., Figure 8), three levels of the basin sediments have oil and gas generation potential, and oil and gas have been generated. The basin also has many potential reservoirs. Although gas and oil are being produced from the Korudağ Anticlinorium and its sub-parallel anticlines, it has not yet been tested and explored comprehensively.

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFormation

uPetroleum geology

uConclusions

uAcknowledgement

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFormation

uPetroleum geology

uConclusions

uAcknowledgement

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFormation

uPetroleum geology

uConclusions

uAcknowledgement

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFormation

uPetroleum geology

uConclusions

uAcknowledgement

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uFormation

uPetroleum geology

uConclusions

uAcknowledgement

uReferences

 

Figure Captions

Figure 1. Simplified regional geology of NW Turkey and location map of the Korudag Anticlinorium, oil and gas fields, dry wells and seismic lines. Legend: 1) Istranca Massive, 2) Istanbul Paleozoic sediments, 3) Paleotethys remnants, 4) Upper Cretaceous arc volcanics, 5) Neotethys subduction-accretionary complex, 6) Thrace Basin sediments.

Figure 2. Generalized stratigraphic succession of the southern Thrace Basin.

Figure 3. Geological map of SW Thrace Basin (modified from Saner, 1985; Onal, 1986; Siyako et al., 1989; Sumengen and Terlemez, 1991; MTA, 2002).

Figure 4. Block diagram of SW Korudag Mountain and environs.

Figure 5. Time-migrated seismic sections along lines 1-8.

Figure 6. Cross-section along Isiklardag (Ganos) Mountain (see geological map of SW Thrace Basin for location; modified from Okay et al., 2004).

Figure 7. Satellite image and block diagram of the Korudag Anticlinorium.

Figure 8. Burial history profiles and interpreted oil and gas maturation/expulsion (Huvaz et al., 2005, 2007).

Formation of the Korudag Anticlinorium

The Korudag Anticlinorium formed during the Early Miocene, as folded pre-Lower Miocene sediments are seen to be unconformably overlain by unfolded Middle Miocene sediments. The tectonic stresses controlling the formation of the Korudag Anticlinorium were created by the closure of the Neotethys Ocean during late Early Miocene. However, the present Korudag Anticlinorium was shaped by the Oldest Splay of the NAF (late Middle Miocene) and effects of the NAF-N (not earlier than 200 Ka).

Petroleum Geology of the Korudag Anticlinorium

The source rocks in the south Trace Basin are represented by a) the Karaagac or Hamitabat Formation, b) the Gazikoy or Ceylan Formation, c) the Mezardere Formation.

The reservoir rocks in the south Thrace Basin are represented by a) the Karaagac Formation, b) the Ficitepe Formation, c) the Sogucak Formation, d) the Gazikoy Formation, e) the Kesan Formation, f) the Osmancik Formation, and g) the Danisment Formation.

Conclusions

Production of the North Marmara, Degirmenkoy, Cayirdere, Seymen, Karacali, Yulafli, Tekirdag, Sevindik and Vakiflar fields should be associated with the Korudag Anticlinorium and its sub-parallel anticlines. Therefore, exploration should be tried in extensions of the Anticlinorium, such as offshore Tekirdag, including targeting the Hamitabat Formation with deeper wells. Despite the 19 unsuccessful exploration wells, potential reservoirs of the Sogucak, Ficitepe and Karaagac formations in the Korudag Anticlinorium should be tested in the SW Thrace and NW Aegean Sea.

Presently, the Ghawar Anticline located in Saudi Arabia, which is 280 km long and 30 km wide and harbors 60 billion barrels of oil and much gas, is considered to be the largest unified petroleum trap in the world (Xian, et al., 2003; Afifi, 2005; Durham, 2005; Saner et al., 2005; Dasgupta, 2005). However, Korudag Anticlinorium, at nearly 300 km long and 40 km wide, is larger than the Ghawar Anticline. Although giant structures are not always giant petroleum traps, such as the Destin Dome in the Gulf of Mexico, the Korudag Anticlinorium has not been tested and explored extensively.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Research Fund of Istanbul University (Project number 1773/21122001) and the Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO). We thank I. Erdal Kerey (Beykent University), Sener Usumezsoy and Esref Yalcinkaya (Istanbul University), Salih Saner (Schlumberger Oilfield Services, Saudi Arabia), Gilbert Kelling (Keele University), Aynur Buyukutku (Ankara University), Mete Gurel, Zihni Aksoy, Hasan Emiroglu and Attila Ozatar (Turkish Petroleum Company) and Selami Incedalci (Petroleum Affairs of Turkey) for helpful and constructive comments. We also would like to thank Gretchen M. Gillis, Gary L. Prost, Patrick M. Shannon, Ronald A. Nelson, and Laird B. Thompson for their helpful comments and suggestions that greatly improved our manuscript.

Selected References

A.M. Afifi, 2005, Ghawar: Anatomy of the world’s largest oil field: Search and Discovery Article #20026 (2005).

Armijo, R., B. Meyer, A. Hubert, and A. Barka, 1999, Westward propagation of the North Anatolian Fault into the northern Aegean: timing and kinematics: Geology, v. 27, p. 267-270.

Armijo, R., B. Meyer, S. Navarro, and G. King, 2002, Slip partitioning in the Sea of Marmara pullapart: a clue to propagation processes of the North Anatolian Fault: Terra Nova, v. 14, p. 80-86.

Dasgupta, S.N., 2005, When 4D seismic not applicable: Alternative modeling scenarios for the Arp-D Reservoirs in the Ghawar Field: Geophysical Prospecting, v. 53, p. 215-227.

Durham, L.S., 2005, Saudi Arabia’s Ghawar Field, The elephant of all elephants, AAPG Explorer, January.

Huvaz, O., H. Sarikaya, and O.M. Nohut, 2005, Nature of a regional dogleg pattern in maturity profiles of the Thrace Basin, northwestern Turkey: a newly discovered unconformity or a thermal anomaly?: AAPG Bulletin, v. 89, no. 10, p. 1373-1396.

Kurt, H., E. Demirbag and I. Kuscu, 2000, Active submarine tectonism and formation of the Gulf of Saros, Northeast Aegean Sea, inferred from multi-channel seismic reflection data: Marine Geology, v. 165, p. 13-26.

LePichon, X., A.M.C. Sengor, E. Demirbag, C. Rangin, and C. Imren, 2001, The active Main Marmara Fault, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, v. 192, p. 595-616.

LePichon, X., N. Chamot-Rooke, C. Rangin, and A.M.C. Sengor, 2003, The North Anatolian Fault in the Sea of Marmara:Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 108 B4, p. 2179.

MTA, 2002, Turkiye jeoloji haritasi: Maden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitusu, olcek 1:500,000 Ankara.

Okay, A.I., O. Tuysuz, and S. Kaya, 2004, From transpression to transtension: changes in morphology and structure around a bend on the North Anatolian Fault in the Marmara region: Tectonophysics, v. 391, p. 259-282.

Onal, M., 1986, Geliboul Yarimadasi orta bolumunun cokelme ortamlari ve tektonigi, KB Anadolu, Turkiye, Ist. Univ. Yerbilimleri Dergisi c. 5, s. 1-2, p. 21-38.

Saatcilar, R., S. Ergintav, E. Demirbag and S. Inan, 1999, Character of active faulting in the North Aegean Sea: Marine Geology, v. 160, p. 339-353.

Saner, S., 1985, Saros Korfezi dolayinin cokelme istifleri ve tektonik yerlesimi, Kuzeydogu Ege Denizi, Turkiye: TJK. Bulteni, v. 28, p. 1-10.

Saner, S., K. Al-Hinai, and D. Perincek, 2005, Surface expressions of the Ghawar structure, Saudi Arabia: Marine and Petroleum Geology, v. 22, p. 657-670.

Seeber, L., O. Emre, M.H. Cormier, C.C. Sorlien, C. McHugh, A. Polonia, N. Ozer, and N. Cagatay, 2004, Uplift and subsidence from oblique slip: the Ganos-Marmara bend of the North Anatolian Transform, Western Turkey: Tectonophysics, v. 391, p. 239-258.

Sengor, A.M.C., O. Tuysuz, C. Imren, M. Sakinc, N. Gorur, X. LePichon, and C. Rangin, 2005, The North Anatolian Fault: A new look:, Annual Review,. Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 33, p. 1-75.

Siyako, M., K.A. Burkan, and A.I. Okay, 1989, Biga ve Geliboul Yarimadalari’nin Tersiyer jeolojisi ve hidrokarbon olanaklari: TPJD Bulteni, v. 1, p. 183-199.

Siyako, M., 2006, Tarkya Havzasinin linyitli kumtaslari, MTA Dergisi, v. 132, p. 63-73.

Sumengen, M. and I. Terlemez, 1991, Guneybati Trakya yoresi Eosen cokelleri stratigrafisi, MTA Dergisi, v. 113, p. 17-30.

Xiao, H.B., B. Payne, A. Neville, and G. Gregory, 2003, An overview of Ghawar structure as revealed by Ghawar supercube (abs.): AAPG Annual Meeting, Search and Discovery Article #90013 (2003).

Yaltirak, C., and B. Alpar, 2002, Kinematics and evolution of the northern branch of the North Anatolian Fault (Ganos Fault) between the Sea of Marmara and the Gulf of Saros: Marine Geology, v. 190, p. 307-327.

 

Return to top.