Click to view complete article.
Structural and Petrophysical Characterization of Mixed Drain/Barrier Fault
Zones in Carbonates: Example from the Castellas
Fault
(SE France)
Christophe Matonti, Juliette Lamarche, Yves Guglielmi, and Lionel Marié
Aix–Marseille Univ, CEREGE Centre Saint-Charles, Marseille, France
During fault
activity, strain not only affects the
fault
plane but also extends into a rock volume called the
fault
zone. A
fault
zone is commonly divided into three structural parts accommodating increased strain towards the
fault
plane (Chester & Logan, 1987): (1) the
fault
core, a centimeter-to-meter-wide area where pervasive deformation obliterates the initial rock facies; (2) the damage zone, a plurimeter to hectometer-scale wide area containing numerous fractures related to the
fault
genesis, (e.g Micarelli et al., 2006; Mitchell & Faulkner, 2009); (3) the protolith zone, the surrounding undamaged host rock.
Fault
-zone petrophysical characterization is a crucial issue in reservoir exploitation, because
fault
zones can behave either as hydraulic barriers or as drains. In the first case,
fault
zones lead to compartmentalizing of the reservoir; in the second case, they connect porous volumes and drain fluids along high permeability corridors. In addition, combining petrophysical analyses with
fault
-zone structural characterization is a challenge, because faults may display a number of different hydraulic properties, depending on the presence of an impermeable core, the
fault
-zone width and complexity, and the diffusivity of the fracture pattern (density, connectivity, and strike).
Finally a conceptual model of the fault
zone's current hydraulic properties in 3D is proposed, in which the
fault
zone acts as a mixed drain/barrier element. It takes into account two different scales of permeability: the micrometer matrix scale and the meter-to plurimeter scale of fractures. Three contrasting fluid flow behaviours are defined for the Castellas
fault
-zone : (1) sealed impermeable barrier to the fluid flow, which is present in site 1; (2) drain behaviour which allow perpendicular and parallel flow with respect to the
fault
strike and occur in site 2 and 4; (3) and a mixed behavior within which flow can occur only parallel to the
fault
-zone strike. It’s the case in site 3 and 5.
This model could not only represent relatively small faults with moderate offset, but also suggests the complexity such faults can contribute to fluid flow in carbonate reservoirs.
AAPG Search and Discovery Article #120034©2012 AAPG Hedberg Conference Fundamental Controls on Flow in Carbonates, Saint-Cyr Sur Mer, Provence, France, July 8-13, 2012