--> Abstract: 3D Seismic on Surmont – Improving Resources and Risks Assessment, by Denis Druesne, Richard Shang, and Bryan Vandal; #90075 (2008)

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

3D Seismic on Surmont – Improving Resources and Risks Assessment

Denis Druesne1, Richard Shang2, and Bryan Vandal2
1 Total EP Canada seconded to ConocoPhillips Canada, Calgary, AB
2 ConocoPhillips Canada, Calgary, AB

Located within the Athabasca basin, the Surmont lease resources are currently estimated to approximately 20 Bbbl of bitumen in place. The Surmont project will develop the oil sands (~8 API) by the means of the Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage process (SAGD). SAGD Oil sands developments projects are characterized by a large number of horizontal wells required to maintain a ~30 years production plateau.

The reservoir, located within the McMurray Formation (Albo-Aptian), is primarily made of unconsolidated sandstones deposited in a fluvio-estuarine environment with high facies variability. As for most development projects in the Athabasca oil sands the resource evaluation historically relied on the delineation wells with very limited seismic input. The interpolation of well information in this highly heterogeneous reservoir environment remains a challenge, especially when dealing with a relatively low well density.

From a subsurface viewpoint, the challenges are numerous; three of them are particularly relevant:

  • The localization of the main “SAGDable” reservoir
  • The Thief Zones ( water and/or gas overlying the bitumen) distribution
  • The understanding of the complex reservoir architecture

The Surmont database consists of 415km2 (two third of the Lease area) of high quality 3D seismic data acquired over 5 winters. The seismic imaging quality is fair but the interpretation remains challenging, mainly due to:

  • The seismic resolution and the lack of velocity contrast between lithologies (shale and sand)
  • The complex geological environment: high facies variability
  • The complex fluid distribution (gas and water over bitumen) together with a limited knowledge of the petroelastic behavior of the bitumen

The only obvious seismic horizons to define the McMurray reservoir are the Wabiskaw/McMurray marker and the Devonian Unconformity marker. The seismic signal within the reservoir is complex and corresponds to a mix of discontinuous reflections associated with lithological variations and/or fluid effects that are difficult to differentiate

The integration of conventional well logs, high resolution electric imaging, geological core and seismic information has led to:

  • Better resources and risks categorization assessment
  • Reducing uncertainties
  • Improving reservoir models, therefore well performance predictability

In this paper we are presenting an interpretation and integrated methodology developed on Surmont to enhance resources / risks mapping and to better understand the McMurray reservoir architecture to optimize bitumen recovery. The interpretation does not require “rocket-science technology” it remains pragmatic and relied strongly on data integration.

Fig.1 Seismic line with Main “SAGDable” reservoir interpretation and fluid repartition analysis

Fig.2 McMurray Intra reservoir stratigraphical surfaces picked in the 3D


AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90075©2008 AAPG Hedberg Conference, Banff, Alberta, Canada