--> Abstract: Surface Seismic Multicomponent Imaging of Deep Tight Gas Sands, by Ron Harris and John O'Brien; #90078 (2008)

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Surface Seismic Multicomponent Imaging of Deep Tight Gas Sands

Ron Harris1 and John O'Brien2
1Bossier Development, Anadarko Petroleum, The Woodlands, TX
2Geophysical Technology, Anadarko Petroleum, The Woodlands, TX

In 2004, Anadarko Petroleum initiated a comprehensive geophysical program to evaluate how to best image deep over-pressured tight gas sands in the East Texas Basin, USA. These Upper Jurassic sands have a low acoustic impedance contrast with the encasing shales leading to a weak P-P reflectivity series. This program included the following elements:

1) 3-D Seismic Imaging. A 72 sq. mile conventional 3-D seismic survey was recorded with single-component analog geophones. The seismic source consisted of buried explosive charges infilled as needed with vibroseis source points.

2) Multicomponent Seismic Imaging. A 9 sq. mile three-component 3-D survey was recorded with a static spread of Vectorseis accelerometers centrally embedded within the larger conventional 3-D survey. All source points for the conventional P-wave survey were recorded concurrently by the Vectorseis spread.

3) Multi-offset, multicomponent VSP survey. The objectives of the VSP program were (a) to provide direct observation and comparison of P-P versus P-S imaging of these tight gas sands, (b) to provide calibration of the P-P and P-S surface seismic data to well log data, and (c) to provide a means of registering the P-P and P-S data.

The VSP program, provided strong encouragement for the use of 3-D surface multicomponent seismic to image deep tight gas sands. The P-P 3-D survey was also successful, producing significantly improved imaging of the target interval when compared to existing 2-D data. However, the P-S imaging of these deep targets (12,000’ - 16,000’) was disappointing. The deep section experienced poor signal to noise, limited bandwidth, and image quality that was inadequate for structural mapping purposes.

In this poster we present the P-P and P-S 3-D seismic results, and discuss possible factors that may have influenced the surface seismic multicomponent imaging results.

 

AAPG Search and Discover Article #90078©2008 AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas