Kansas Geological Survey
Abstract: Influence of Lithology and Pore Geometry on NMR Prediction
of Permeability and Effective
Porosity in Mississippian Carbonates,
Kansas
Summary
Saturated and desaturated NMR response was integrated with
air-brine and air-mercury capillary pressure analysis and with
lithologic and other petrophysical analyses for cores from a
carbonate reservoir in Kansas. This integration provides guidelines
for selection of appropriate T2 cutoffs. in these rocks and an
understanding of lithologic controls on permeability prediction
using NMR response. Three cores from the Mississippian reservoir,
Schaben Field, Ness County, Kansas were studied (Figure 1). From
these wells, 50 core plugs, representing a wide range in porosity,
permeability, and lithology were selected for detailed
investigation. Special core-analysis testing was performed on these
samples including (for most samples): routine and in situ porosity
and pore volume compressibility, routine air and in situ
Klinkenberg permeability, air-brine capillary pressure analysis and
determination of “irreducible” brine saturation,
air-mercury capillary pressure on selected samples, effective
and
relative gas permeability, determination of the Archie cementation
and saturation exponents, and saturated and desaturated NMR
analysis for selected samples. Core lithologies were described and
thin-sections of representative samples were examined. A portion of
this work was funded as part of the DOE and industry supported
Class 2 project (Cooperative agreement DE-FC22-93BC14987).
The reservoir is composed primarily of dolomite or lime mudstone-wackestone, sponge spicule-rich wackestone-packstone, and echinoderm-rich wackestone-packstone-grainstone. Porosity within these lithologies is generally intergranular, intercrystalline, or moldic but may also contain a significant portion of vugs. Grain or crystal sizes are fine to micrite size (<100um to <2um) resulting in very fine pores. Brecciation, fracturing, and carbonate replacement with microporous chert are common in all lithologies. Each lithology exhibits a generally unique range of porosity and permeability values which together define a continuous porosity-permeability trend. Where fracturing and vugs are present, permeability is enhanced and the range in permeability for any given porosity is broadened. Mercury capillary pressure analysis shows that pore throat size for all lithologies is the dominant control on permeability and threshold entry pressures.
Oil columns in this region are generally less than 50 feet.
Water saturations, corresponding to the capillary pressure
generated by this column, correlate well with permeability for
rocks with little or no vuggy porosity or microporous chert.
Because of this correlation, permeability prediction using both
porosity and T2 is improved over prediction using porosity alone.
While a causal relationship exists between effective
porosity (and
pore body size), measured by T2, and permeability, the relative
influence of
effective
porosity and pore body sizes appears to be
small compared to the influence of pore throats. Based on the
significant difference in the correlation between T2 and
permeability for rocks with and without vugs, it is probable that
this correlation is partially based on a correlation between pore
body and pore throat size which can differ between lithologies
exhibiting different pore geometries. If this is correct, accurate
permeability prediction using NMR will require
“calibration” of the T2-permeability relationship for
each lithology exhibiting a unique relationship between pore
throats and pore bodies. These correlations and the constant or
exponents obtained will therefore be lithology specific. However,
relationships using T2 in addition to porosity should also provide
a significant improvement over permeability prediction using
porosity alone. Where vuggy porosity is present, T2 cutoffs
appropriate for intergranular porosity do not provide good
permeability prediction. Based on these observations appropriate T2
cutoffs for delineating
effective
intergranular porosity are range
from 10 to 100 and increase with increasing permeability and pore
throat and body size.
AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90928©1999 AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas