[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

ABSTRACT: A Comparison of Depth Conversion Methods in the Gulf of Mexico

Melvan D. Carter, Gary R. Hyatt

The conversion of two-way seismic times into a depth picture has been done using six different methods for a study area in the Gulf of Mexico. From the simplest constant function approach to the "layer cake" method, and finally to an average Previous HitvelocityNext Hit technique based upon seismic velocities, each has advantages and disadvantages. Four time horizons were converted using each method and calibrated at nine well locations. The shallowest and flattest marker has a Previous HitvariableNext Hit mean error (from 0 to 93 ft) but a relatively stable standard deviation (from 22 to 43 ft). The deepest reflection has a highly Previous HitvariableNext Hit mean error (from 0 to 474 ft) and an almost equally Previous HitvariableNext Hit standard deviation (from 75 to 280 ft). This mistie study examines the depth conversion error as a function of l yer, depth, and space. While the results cannot be generalized blindly, seismic average Previous HitvelocityNext Hit technique calibrated to the wells was the best method for the four horizons. It is noteworthy that the "layer cake" result using a constant depth normalized interval Previous HitvelocityNext Hit was slightly better than a full-blown seismic Previous HitvelocityTop technique for the deepest horizon. Since the conversion of time into depth is done with some measure of uncertainty, it is vital that the final depth map be quantified as to accuracy. For the explorationist, it is imperative that the best technique for depth conversion be used as dictated by the exploration objectives and the available time and resources.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90999©1990 GCAGS and Gulf Coast Section SEPM Meeting, Lafayette, Louisiana, October 17-19, 1990