--> --> Three-Component Amplitude vs. Offset Analysis, by Deborah Miles, Gary Gassaway, Laurie Bennett, and Richard Brown; #91024 (1989)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Three-Component Amplitude vs. Offset Analysis

Deborah Miles, Gary Gassaway, Laurie Bennett, Richard Brown

Amplitude changes in compressional waves (P waves) from a specific reflector are a function of their angle of incidence and the elastic constant contrast at the boundary. Previous HitZoeppritzNext Hit, in 1909, quantified this relationship in his simplification of Knott's 1899 Previous HitequationsNext Hit. Beginning about 1976, P-wave amplitude changes with angle of incidence on single-component seismic data were analyzed through modeling or inversion to obtain shear wave (S wave) velocities, and Poisson's ratio. Using three-component seismic data and Previous HitZoeppritzNext Hit Previous HitequationsNext Hit, one can also analyze the S-wave amplitude changes with offset by solving for the P-wave velocity. Thus, with three-component seismic data, the amplitude vs. offset inversion (AVO) of the P-wave gathers (SAMPLE3TM) provides an S-wav velocity and Poisson's ratio, and the AVO inversion of the S-wave gather yields P-wave velocities. Since they are done at the same CDP, the two solutions must agree and thereby tie the P-wave reflectors to the S-wave reflectors. The amplitude changes with offset of the converted waves are also predicted by Previous HitZoeppritzNext Hit Previous HitequationsTop and can be used to check the predicted P- and S-wave velocities.

Processing three-component seismic data for AVO analysis generally follows a processing flow similar to the processing flow for single-component data. Just as in single component AVO, the processor must be sure to preserve the amplitude relative to the other traces. However, the processing must also preserve the relative amplitudes between components. After processing to a P-wave, common offset gather, corrections for the free surface effects, source arrays, receiver arrays, and spherical divergence are applied to the amplitudes. When doing AVO inversions (SAMPLETM) on single-component seismic data, the corrections are calculated for z only with the assumption that there is no energy in the transverse direction. However, with three-component data, the corrections for spheri al divergence and the source and receiver arrays must be calculated in terms of wave fronts, not just ray paths, and for all three components. Geophone arrays are generally unnecessary for three-component seismic since the OMNIPHONE polarization filter removes much of the groundroll from three-component seismic data either in a processing center or in the field using a single OMNIPHONE.

Using AVO inversion (SAMPLE3) to tie the P-wave, S-wave, and converted-wave data together gives the interpreter expanded interpretation capabilities. First, by identifying the top and bottom of a specific zone, one can use P-wave and S-wave time isochrons to calculate Poisson's ratio. Changes in Poisson's ratio or Vp/Vs ratios are indicative of changes in pore fluids and lithologies. Second, geologic features such as reefs may be stronger events on the S-wave or converted-wave data than on the P-wave data, or vice versa. Therefore, by comparing the P, shear, and converted wave data, one may locate previously unknown responses.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #91024©1989 AAPG Pacific Section, May 10-12, 1989, Palm Springs, California.