Click to view article in PDF format.

 

Framework for the Exploration of Libya: An Illustrated Summary

Compiled by

Jingyao Gong1

 Search and Discovery Article #10061 (2004)

 

1AAPG/Datapages, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma (jgong@aapg.org)

 

General Statement 

Recoverable reserves being produced in Libya, from more than 300 fields, exceed 50 billion barrels of oil and 40 trillion cubic feet of gas (Rusk, 2001, 2002). Even so, the Sirte (Sirt), Ghadamis, Murzuq, and Tripolitania basins  (Figure 1) are yet to reach full maturity in exploration. Of the 24 giant fields, 20 were discovered prior to 1970. Deep plays are expected to be a large part of upcoming exploration efforts. 

Rusk (2001. 2002), in describing the petroleum potential of the centers of Libyan basins, summarized very well the petroleum systems and plays in six basin-center sectors (Figures 1, 2, 3, and 4). This compilation uses the Rusk article as the foundation for presenting several other published maps, cross-sections, and a database, as well as some images in his article; together these should add to the working tool kit for those interested in exploration of Libya. 

Maps presented here are in JPEG and PDF formats; for those interested in GIS applications, an expanded version, an atlas, has been prepared for GIS-UDRIL sponsors and other purchasers of AAPG digital products. In the expanded version, approximately 80 georeferenced maps show tectonic features, structural elements and their configuration, thicknesses and facies of key strata and reservoirs, and oil and gas fields, with links to databases and to other images.  

The database of giant Libyan fields is from M.K. Horn (2003) in AAPG Memoir 78, Giant Oil and Gas Fields of the Decade 1990-1999. Other information is from various AAPG publications as well as Journal of Petroleum Geology (see Selected Bibliography).

 

The basin-center sectors in which significant petroleum systems have developed (Rusk, 2001, 2002) are: 

Sirte Basin (Figure 2)

     South Ajdabiya Trough

     Maradah Graben

     Southern Zallah Trough – Tumayam Trough

Ghadamis Basin (Figure 3)

Murzuq Basin (Figure 3)

Eastern Tripolitania Basin (Figure 4)

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uGeneral statement

uFigures 1-7

uSirte Basin

uGhadamis Basin

uMurzuq Basin

uEastern Tripolitania Basin

uTable 1

uGiant fields

uFigures 8-19

uSelected Sirte Basin fields

  uAmal

  uIntisar D

  uMesslah

  uNasser

uSelected bibliography

  uReferences (Gong)

  uReferences (Rusk)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figures 1-7

Figure 1. Tectonic elements of Libya, with oil and gas fields, areas of underexplored basin-centers (Rusk’s areas of study), and structural contours in the west (modified after Rusk, 2001, 2002).

Figure 2. Structural elements of the Sirte Basin, with oil and gas fields, and the three areas of underexplored basin-centers (from Rusk, 2001, 2002).

Figure 3. Structural contour map, on top Ordovician, of Ghadamis and Murzuq basins, with oil and gas fields and discoveries (from Rusk, 2001, 2002).

Figure 4. Structural contour map, on top Eocene Metlaoui Group, of the Tripolitania Basin in offshore Libya, showing oil fields and discoveries (from Rusk, 2001, 2002).

Figure 5. Generalized correlation chart for the underexplored areas of the Sirte Basin, showing lithology, source rock, and reservoir (from Rusk, 2001, 2002).

Figure 6. Generalized correlation chart for the Ghadamis and Murzuq basins, showing lithology, source rock, and reservoir (from Rusk, 2001, 2002).

Figure 7. Generalized correlation chart for the Tripolitania Basin, showing lithology, source rock, and reservoir (from Rusk, 2001, 2002).

Return to top.

Sirte Basin 

Common features of the three underexplored elements of the Sirte Basin (Figure 2) are: 

  • Nearby oil production

  • Outstanding source rock (Upper Cretaceous Sirte-Rachmat Shale)

  • Large areal extent

  • Limited number of tests to pre-Upper Cretaceous units

 

South Ajdabiya Trough 

The underexplored parts of the Ajdabiya Trough cover 8500 km2. In addition to the Sirte-Rachmat Shale (Campanian-Coniacian in age), the Cenomanian-Turonian Etel Formation is an effective source rock, and the Lower Cretaceous lacustrine to lagoonal shale in the Nubian (Sarir) section probably should be considered a minor source (Figure 5). Reservoirs include the Nubian sandstones and Paleocene Lower and Upper Sabil carbonates.

 

Maradah Graben 

The underexplored part of Maradah Graben is 10,000 km2 in areal extent. The Sirte-Rachmat Shale and the Etel Formation are the known source rocks in this sector (Figure 5). Important reservoirs are the Nubian sandstones, carbonates of the Zelten Formation (equivalent to the Sabil), and Upper Cretaceous Bahi Sandstone, overlying the Nubian.

 

Southern Zallah Trough – Tumajam Trough 

These troughs in the southern to southwestern part of the Sirte Basin contain 25,000 km2 that are underexplored. The Sirte-Rachmat Shale is the known source rock of this area (Figure 5). Nubian sandstones and the commonly indistinguishable Bahi Sandstone are important reservoirs, along with Paleocene Defa and Beda and lower Eocene Facha limestones. Also, as potential reservoirs are Upper Cretaceous sandstones in the Sirte-Rachmat interval.

Return to top.

 

Central Ghadamis Basin 

The basin-center sector encompasses more than 20,000 km2. Two very good source rocks are distributed throughout the entire basin: Lower Silurian Tanezzuft and Middle to Upper Devonian Uennin formations (Figure 6). The main reservoirs are the Upper Silurian Acacus and the Lower Devonian Tadrart and Kasa formations. Three other objectives are the Middle Devonian Uennin Sandstone, Upper Devonian Tahara Formation, and the Triassic Ras Hamia Formation.

 

Central Murzuq Basin 

In this area of more than 30,000 km2, up to the year 2000 only four wells had been drilled. In the area to the north, where oil reserves are some 1 billion barrels, the reservoirs are the sandstones of the Ordovician Memouniat Formation (Figure 6).  

The documented source rock is the Tanezzuft Shale, although some oil may have been sourced from the Uennin Shale. The potential reservoirs include the Acacus and Tadrart-Kasa sandstones, as well as the Memouniat.

 

Eastern Tripolitania Basin 

This offshore basin, which is a highly faulted, deep trough, extends from the Gulf of Gabes to the northwestern margin of the Sirte Basin. The eastern sector is some 20,000 km2 in extent and is essentially unexplored, with only one dry hole (up to the year 2000); known accumulations are 100-150 km west of the area. 

Source rocks include the Turonian Bahloul limestone, Necomian-Cenomanian Sidi Kralif – Fahdene shales, Silurian Tanezzuft Shale (in the southwesternmost part), and lower Eocene Chouabine Limestone (in the western part) (Figure 7). Potential reservoirs are (1) limestone comprising the lower Eocene El Garia Formation (of the Metlaoui Group), the main pay in the basin, (2) the Jirani and Bilal carbonates, the equivalent of, or underlying, the El Garia, (3) carbonates of the Alagah and Makhabaz formations (or Lidam-Argub) (Cenomanian-Turonian), and (4) marine sandstones and rudist carbonates of the Lower Cretaceous Turghat-Kiklah sequence.

 

Table 1 

Table 1. Database for giant fields of Libya (from M.K. Horn, 2003).

 

Giant Fields 

The giant fields in Libya (Horn, 2003) are listed below according to basin; the database of selected features of these fields, prepared by M.K. Horn (2003), is presented in Table 1.

 

Sirte Basin

  Augila-Nafoora

  Bahi

  Beda

  Bu Attifel

  Dahra East

  Defa

  Gialo

  Intisar A

  Intisar D

 

Mabril

  Masrab

  Messlah

  Nasser (Zelten)

  Samah

  Sarir C

  Sarir L

  Waha

 

Ghadamis Basin

  Al Wafa

 

Murzuk Basin

  Elephant

 

Tripolitania Basin

  Bouri

Return to top.

 

Figure 8-19 

Figure 8. Schematic cross-section of the northwestern part of Sirte Basin, noting stages of graben development, as well as showing character of traps and lithology and stratigraphic positions of productive reservoirs, as of 1984 (from Harding, 1984).

Figure 9. Structural contour map, on base of Upper Cretaceous Rakb Formation, of Amal Field, showing large north-northwest-plunging nose (from Roberts, 1970).

Figure 10. East-west electric cross section of Amal field, illustrating unconformity at base of Upper Cretaceous and the positions of Cambro-Ordovician Amal Formation, the main pay, and the transgressive Maragah Formation, which produces on the northeast flank of the field.

Figure 11. Location map of five fields, representing five Paleocene pinnacle reefs (from Brady et al., 1980).

Figure  12. Structural contour map, top lst porosity (Paleocene Upper Sabil Formation), of circular Intisar D Field. Pinnacle shows about 1000 feet of relief. Line is for cross-section in Figure 13. (From Brady et al., 1980).

Figure 13. Stratigraphic cross-section of Intisar D reef, illustrating relations of reservoir rock to shale and marls in trough and capping reef (from Brady et al., 1980).

Figure 14. Structural elements in the area of Sarir (Nubian) Sandstone fields, including Sarir and Messlah. The latter is on the east margin of an extensive basement high. (From Ambrose, 2000).

Figure 15. Structural contour map, on intra-Sarir Sandstone zone, with limit of field. Over much of the field, the dip is rather uniformly ˝ to 1o east to northeast. (From Clifford et al., 1980).

Figure 16. West-east cross-section A-A’ in Concession 80, Messlah Field, showing sand development, wedge-out, and truncation (from Clifford et al., 1980).

Figure 17. West-east cross-section B-B’ in Concession 65, Messlah Field, showing sand development, wedge-out, and truncation (from Clifford et al., 1980).

Figure 18. Location map of Nasser (Zelten) Field and platform-bounding fault, with generalized structure on top of “reservoir unit.” B-B’ is line for facies cross-section in Figure 19. (Modified after Bebout and Pendexter, 1975; Harding, 1984).

Figure 19. Facies cross-section B-B’, showing the facies with the highest porosities in color; datum is top Meghil Member (lower Eocene) overlying the main pay (Zelten “Member”). Structure shows modest growth during deposition of the productive shelf limestones. (Modified from Bebout and Pendexter, 1975).

 

Selected Sirte Basin Fields 

Producing reservoirs in the giant fields of the Sirte Basin range from Precambrian basement (igneous rocks) to Oligocene sands. Fracture porosity is important not only in the basement rocks but also in Cambro-Ordovician sandstone at Amal field. Pre-Upper Cretaceous sandstones are important reservoirs in the Sarir, Messlah, Bu Attifel, and Masrab fields. Paleocene and Upper Cretaceous carbonates are the main reservoirs in the other Sirte Basin giant fields. 

The primary trap in the giant fields ranges from anticline (the most common type), nose, and fault block, to reef and wedge-out/truncation (Horn, 2003). Together, they reflect the tectonic history of the basin, with Mesozoic pre-graben arching, pre-Late Cretaceous faulting and nonmarine sedimentation, Late Cretaceous graben development, represented by several arms, and, to a less extent, Eocene-Neogene sag (Harding, 1984) (Figure 8). 

Below are sketch-like summaries of fields that together are fairly representative of the range of features the giant fields possess.

 

Amal Field (Figures 2, 9, and 10

Amal Field is on a north-northwest plunging nose, locally with more than 100 feet of closure at the Rakb (Upper Cretaceous) level. The nose is bounded by major platform/trough-bounding faults. The field is some 30 miles long and 10 miles wide.  

The main reservoirs are the Cambro-Ordovician Amal Formation, with its fractured quartzose sandstone, and the transgressive-marine sandstones of the Maragh Formation, probably Late Cretaceous in age.

 

Intisar D Field (Figures 2, 11, 12, and 13

Intisar D Field is one of five productive Paleocene pinnacle reefs that grew in an embayment bounded by three carbonate banks (Brady et al., 1980). It is approximately three miles in diameter. The reef consists largely of corals and algae, with grain- and mud-supported skeletal carbonates. Reef development was responsible for the spectacular reservoir (with 22% porosity) and trap (with 995-foot oil column).

 

Messlah (Messla) Field (Figures 2, 14, 15, 16, and 17

Messlah field, more than 25 miles long and 5 miles wide, is a stratigraphic trap located on the east flank of a broad Precambrian basement high (Clifford et al., 1980). The reservoir is Lower Cretaceous fluvial Sarir (Nubian) Sandstone, which wedges-out to the west onto the basement. It is truncated by the widespread unconformity at the base of the Upper Cretaceous section. It is similar in type and size to East Texas Field.

 

Nasser (Zelten) Field (Figures 2, 18, and 19

Nasser Field produces from highly porous Paleocene-Eocene limestone in a faulted anticline that borders the Maradah Graben. The field is more than 16 miles long (parallel to the fault) and 9 miles wide. The Paleocene Zelten “Member,” which is the main pay, experienced porosity enhancement due to groundwater leaching, and secondary porosity as high as 40% has been reported from three skeletal grain-supported shelf limestone facies (Bebout and Pendexter, 1975). These limestones characterized deposition on the platforms separating the arms of the Sirte Graben during some of the Late Cretaceous and much of the Paleocene, while deeper-water deposits characterized the troughs. During the sag phase, Eocene carbonates extended across trough and platform alike.

Return to top.

 

Selected Bibliography 

References and Source Documents for GIS Atlas 

Al-Shaieb, Z., and J.W. Shelton, 1978, Secondary ferroan dolomite rhombs in oil reservoirs, Chadra sands, Gialo field, Libya: AAPG Bulletin, v. 62, p. 463-468.

Ambrose, G., 2000, The geology and hydrocarbon habitat of the Sarir Sandstone, SE Sirt basin, Libya: Journal of Petroleum Geology, v. 23, p. 165-191.