Click
to view figure in PDF format
Carbonate
Flow
-Unit Definition for
Reservoir
Simulation
Matthew J. Pranter1, Neil F. Hurley2
1University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
2Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado
Flow
units
in carbonate reservoirs have been defined in many ways. Likewise, various techniques exist to identify or designate
flow
units
within a
reservoir
. Among the many methods include the use of rock fabrics, porosity-permeability cutoffs, pore-throat radii (R35), plots of cumulative storage- and
flow
-capacity, and lithology, to name a few. Which technique to use is dependent on the abundance, type, and distribution of data that is available for
reservoir
characterization
and modeling. Ideally,
flow
units
are established within a sequence stratigraphic and structural framework. The construction of a representative stratigraphic or structural framework with an appropriate number of layers or
flow
units
is essential in
reservoir
modeling and simulation.
Facies-keyed, petrophysics-based methods to identify hydraulic
flow
units
within a sequence-stratigraphic framework can be especially useful. For example,
flow
units
can be characterized within high-frequency carbonate sequences through analyses of the vertical variation of
flow
capacity (kh), storage capacity
(
h), and pore-throat radius (R35) associated with vertical successions of carbonate rock fabrics
(Figure 1). Cross-sectional
flow
profiles constructed from log and core petrophysical data are often used to correlate
flow
units
associated with high-frequency cycles or commonly cycle sets. However,
reservoir
-scale lateral petrophysical variability within
flow
units
is often not available from most subsurface data sets and must be estimated or inferred from outcrop analog information or other sources.
In some cases, the various methods for
flow
unit definition can reduce or eliminate the need for additional upscaling of the geologic model prior to
flow
simulation. The varied approaches to
flow
unit definition have been tested with two-dimensional
flow
simulation to evaluate their utility.
Figure 1:
Flow
units
based, in part, on plots of cumulative
flow
capacity versus cumulative storage capacity for a cyclic carbonate
reservoir
(San Andres Formation, Vacuum field, New Mexico).