[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

  Click to view abstract in PDF format.

 

Previous HitGasNext Hit chimneys – indicating fractured cap rocks

By

Helge Løseth, Lars Wensaas, and Børge Arntsen

Statoil, N-7005 Norway

[email protected]

 

Seismic interpreters often observe anomalies that cannot be explained by primary depositional processes or processing artifacts. Previous HitGasNext Hit chimneys are among such anomalies. Several years of research has led to a refined understanding of seismic anomalies related to hydrocarbon leakage processes. The aim of this paper is to present well and seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit related to Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys and to argue that a fractured cap rock model can explain the observations. The term “Previous HitgasNext Hit chimney” is an interpretive term claiming that Previous HitgasNext Hit is causing the noise observed on seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit. The link between Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys and noise zones is clearly shown on un-scaled seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit (Figure 1). Here, the primary reflections are very weak or absent. When the seismic signals are gained (Figure 2), the zone with weak primary reflections appears as a noise zone.

Wells drilled inside noise zones have:

• higher pore fluid pressure,

• higher mud Previous HitgasNext Hit readings,

• higher mud Previous HitgasNext Hit wetness,

• more hydrocarbon shows,

• lower velocities, and

• higher temperatures

than wells drilled outside (Figure 3). Similar observations have been made in several well pairs inside and outside noise zones. Based on these observations we believe that Previous HitgasNext Hit is one important cause of the noise and that it is appropriate to interpret such noise zones as Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys.

Previous HitGasNext Hit chimneys are observed in low-permeable cap rock shales. We believe that fractures must exist in the low-permeable cap rocks in order to explain the observed oil shows within the Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys. Such fractures can also explain the other observations related to Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys.

Tectonic induced processes can create swarms of fractures; e.g., above salt or clay diapirs. Several Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys exist in tectonic fractured cap rocks above salt structures in the Central Graben. In the northern North Sea, Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys are located in cap rocks that show no or few signs of tectonic activity. These Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys are located above high-pressure Jurassic fault blocks. High-pressure fluids in the Jurassic sandstone reservoirs are interpreted to have hydrofractured the cap rock. Well observations from Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys inside tectonic fractured cap rocks above salt domes in the Central Graben are similar to those above high-pressure fields in the northern North Sea (Figure 3).

In order to improve our understanding of Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys we tried to mimic the observed seismic noise by seismic modelling. Several scenarios were modelled. The best match was Previous HitobtainedNext Hit when Previous HitgasNext Hit was distributed as wavelength-sized patches. The low-velocity Previous HitgasNext Hit patches must be irregularly distributed in the low-permeable shales. We suggest that fractures, both hydro-fractures and tectonic fractures, distribute the Previous HitgasNext Hit into irregular patches within the cap rock.

Based on the observations, interpretations, and modeling, we propose that Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys indicate zone of fractured cap rock. If this model is correct, it has several implications to the oil industry. For example, Previous HitgasNext Hit chimneys should be interpreted as hydrocarbon migration pathways, and the extent and location of the migration route can be mapped directly from seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit.

 

Figure Captions

Figure 1. Un-scaled seismic section illustrating that the primary seismic signals are very weak or absent above the Gullfaks South Field.

Figure 2. Scaled seismic section illustrating the noisy zone above the Gullfaks South Field. The noise zone is interpreted as a Previous HitgasNext Hit chimney because it is believed that Previous HitgasNext Hit in sediments is causing the noise. Mud Previous HitgasNext Hit parameters from wells (in projected positions) inside and outside the noise zone is illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Previous HitGasNext Hit chromatography and pressure variations in well pars inside (Well B) and outside (Well A) a Previous HitgasNext Hit chimney. The well inside the Previous HitgasNext Hit chimney has higher mud Previous HitgasTop readings, more heavy components (C2 to C5), more shows and higher pressure than the well outside.