Impact of Realistic Shale Properties on Exploration-Scale Vertical Migration Modeling
Dempster, Kelly, William Almon,
William Dawson, Michael Hertle, ChevronTexaco,
Basin modelers routinely incorporate data and interpretations
from other disciplines into their models: structural and seismic interpretation
for past and present geometry, log analysis for lithologic
content, sequence stratigraphy for depositional
framework and lithologic continuity, biostratigraphy for ages, and geochemistry for source rock
properties, thermal calibration, and migration indicators.
Seal
behavior has historically been treated differently: instead
of adjusting the model inputs to reflect measured values, model results have
usually been compared after the fact to observed
seal
properties. Default shales in basin modeling programs have been designed to be
excellent top seals and to hold large
hydrocarbon
columns
. In the early basin
models for the deep-water prospects in
hydrocarbon
distribution. This empirical method
was not satisfactory, because upward mobility of the hydrocarbons in early
simulations was not as great as observed in on-struc-ture
wells. It also led to variability of results due to differing modeler skills
and experience regarding parameter changes.
The lack of fit
to observed occurrences of
hydrocarbon
required ChevronTexaco
to develop a methodology that incorporates measured shale/
seal
properties into
existing models. Analyses of marine shales reveal
six distinct groups, based on fabric and textural variations. Each type has a
different compaction rate, which influences
seal
character. This variation is
described in terms of porosity-depth and porosity-effective stress
relationships, porosity versus permeability, and capillary entry pressure
distributions. A regional database relates mudstone properties to sequence stratigraphic position and depositional setting. Data
relating interfacial tension to composition, as well as temperature and
pressure, are also captured.