--> Modeling Reservoir Architecture of Isolated Carbonate Platforms

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Modeling Reservoir Architecture of Isolated Carbonate Platforms

 

Bassant, Phillip, Paul (Mitch) Harris, ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company, San Ramon, CA

 

Forward stratigraphic modeling of a conceptual isolated carbonate platform produces four distinct depositional profiles determined essentially by water depth. The depositional profiles described below have characteristic facies belt dimensions, geometries, facies-pro-portions and stratigraphic occurrences. These simulations help to predict facies belt geome­tries and constrain facies belt dimensions for isolated platform reservoirs like those found in the Caspian Basin.

Profile A (shallowest) shows a grainstone shoal margin on the high-energy edge of the platform, 250-500 m wide, with a raised rim and shallow platform interior dominated by packstones. Profile B also shows a high-energy grainstone rim, 500-1000 m wide with no significant margin relief, and a platform interior dominated by packstones. Profile C occurs in a deeper bathymetric setting; high-energy conditions flood the platform, and platform­centered grainstone shoals develop with widths of 2000 – 5000 m. Profile D (deepest pro­file) has deeper water packstones developed across the platform top, with no grainstone development.

In an aggrading platform with only monotonous sea-level rise and no sea-level cyclicity only profile B develops. This is the stable-state for platform-growth in this model. During sea-level still-stands profile A will eventually develop. During a deepening sequence, profiles B, C and D develop in rapid succession prior to final drowning. Profiles C and D can be con­sidered transient or unstable states, as their productivity rates are too low to keep up with sea-level rise, and thus are rare during times of monotonous sea-level rise. However, when sea-level cycles are introduced unstable profiles C and D may dominate the platform. Grainstones (profile C) or packstones (profile D) can dominate platform-top deposition throughout the cycle, with abrupt shallowing to the raised grainstone rim (profile A) occur­ring at maximum sea-level fall.