Multicomponent Seismic Interpretation and its Relation to Production Response in the
Leonardian Drinkard Formation of Vacuum
Field
, Lea County, New Mexico
RAINES, MICHAEL A., Kinder Morgan CO2 Co., L.P., Midland, Texas and TOM L. DAVIS, Colorado School of Mines, Golden Colorado
Vacuum
Field
sits along the margin of the Northwest Shelf of the
Permian Basin in central Lea County, New Mexico. Between 1995 and 1999, a portion of this
area was the study site for 3D/3C (multi-component) and 4D (time lapse) seismic
investigations concentrated on the San Andres Formation, and led by the Colorado School of
Mines’ Reservoir Characterization Project industry consortium (RCP). While RCP was
investigating the broader geological setting of the study area, certain seismic anomalies
became apparent in the Drinkard and Abo formations, especially in the shear-wave dataset.
Static reservoir characterization, using both shear and compressional data, was then
applied to Drinkard and Abo Formations. These investigations established an empirical
relationship between seismic response and production data. Further, the seismic and
production information can be explained by considering reservoir porosity development and
fracture distribution.
Abo deposition set the stage for future geometric relations with a
sharply defined reef-enhanced shelf edge. During Drinkard deposition, relative sea level
rise was slow enough to allow for shelf edge stabilization along the underlying reef
trend. Laterally shifting, highly localized, and interfingering facies tracts (including
patch reefs, which are now productive at Vacuum
Field
) were developed at this time. Today,
enhanced matrix porosity associated with the patch reefs and fracture distribution (both
open and healed) affect production characteristics in the
field
.
Production response was somewhat unclear until the data was broken into two categories: Instantaneous and Long Term. Initial Potential (IP) represented the immediate deliverability of each well, and Average Production over the first six months represented the long term storage space available to each well. Both datasets mapped distinct (but different) patterns. Based on a loosely controlled geologic model constructed from the limited core data available, long term production apparently corresponds to patch reef areas, and higher IP areas correspond to regions of open or partially open fracture sets.
Two seismic datasets exhibited patterns very similar to the production maps. Anisotropy analysis (a comparison of fast and slow shear wave birefringence velocities) matched the IP distribution. A map of the ratio of compressional velocity (VP) to fast shear wave velocity (VS1) gave a response similar to the average production data map. The implication, then, was that VP/VS1 ratio mapping also revealed higher porosity areas, and anisotropy analysis also highlighted regions of open fractures.
Multi-component static characterization can be a powerful tool, once
calibrated to the geology of a specific
field
. If this type of data were available early
in the life of a
field
, an optimized recovery scheme could be developed, and a specific
development drilling plan could be implemented, saving hundreds of thousands of dollars
while
optimizing
field
production.