[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view page images in PDF format


Previous HitGASNext Hit Previous HitHYDRATESNext Hit ON THE HIKURANGI AND FIORDLAND MARGINS, NEW ZEALAND

Ingo A. Pecher1*, Stuart A. Henrys1, Andrew R. Gorman2, and Miko Fohrmann2
1 Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, P.O. Box 30368, Lower Hutt, New Zealand
*Corresponding author: Tel.: +64 4 5704-796, [email protected]
2 Department of Geology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

The presence of Previous HitgasNext Hit Previous HithydratesNext Hit offshore New Zealand has been inferred from bottom simulating reflections (BSRs) for over two decades (Katz, 1981). BSRs are widespread on the Hikurangi margin east of the North Island and on the Fiordland margin southwest of the South Island. New Zealand’s largest conventional Previous HitgasNext Hit field may be depleted in a few years and hence, there is increasing interest in the resource potential of Previous HitgasNext Hit Previous HithydratesNext Hit. Most of our studies are currently focusing on the Hikurangi margin, mainly because of its proximity to major population centers, making it attractive for possible future Previous HitgasNext Hit production.

For this margin, we have performed first estimates of the resource potential in Previous HitgasNext Hit Previous HithydratesNext Hit (Pecher and Henrys, 2003). Because of a paucity of adequate seismic data and lack of drilling and coring of Previous HitgasNext Hit Previous HithydratesNext Hit, our estimates are highly uncertain. However, based on the distribution of BSRs, we were able to constrain the Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate province to an area of about 50,000 km2 (Fig. 1).

Using conservative values for an average Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate saturation of 2% of the pore space, the volume of Previous HitgasNext Hit locked in Previous HitgasNext Hit Previous HithydratesNext Hit in this area is estimated to be over 20,000 km3 at standard temperature and pressure conditions. However, for economic extraction of Previous HitgasNext Hit it may be essential to identify potential Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate “sweet spots”, i.e., areas of high Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate concentration. Previous HitGasNext Hit hydrate concentration is predicted to be directly controlled by methane flux into the Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate stability zone (Xu and Ruppel, 1999). In agreement with this prediction, BSRs on the Hikurangi margin appear strongest in structures that favor fluid flow, in particular beneath anticlines and layer outcrops at the seafloor (Fig. 2). We estimated how much of the margin may favor Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate sweet spots our main criteria being (1) a strong BSR combined with (2) structures that may enhance fluid flow. We found that roughly 10% of the Hikurangi margin Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate province may contain Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate sweet spots. We assumed that Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate concentration in these sweet spots would be at least 30% of pore space in a 10-m thick layer at 40% porosity – numbers that are arbitrary but conservative. We also assumed that only the Previous HitgasNext Hit that forms in excess of the pore volume that is occupied by Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate would be available for Previous HitgasNext Hit production (one volume of Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate generates only about 0.8 volumes of water – we therefore assumed that a fraction of ~0.2 of the original Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate volume will be filled by Previous HitgasNext Hit at in situ pressure and temperature). Using these parameters, over 600 km3 of recoverable Previous HitgasNext Hit (over 20 trillion cubic feet) would be stored in Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate sweet spots on this margin. More accurate estimates will require additional data, including measurement of Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate saturation ideally from drilling.

We have begun to analyze seismic data for evidence of BSRs on the Fiordland margin. While this Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate province appears to cover a smaller area than the Hikurangi margin, BSRs are widespread to the east of the deformation front of this incipient subduction zone. Finally, we are confident that Previous HitgasNext Hit Previous HithydratesNext Hit occur elsewhere in New Zealand’s vast exclusive economic zone, which still contains large “seismically uncharted” areas.

References

Collot, J.-Y., J. Delteil, K. B. Lewis, B. Davy, G. Lamarche, J.-C. Audru, P. Barnes, F. Chanier, E. Chaumillon, S. E. Lallemand, B. Mercier de Lepinay, A. Orpin, B. Pelletier, M. Sosson, B. Toussaint, and C. Uruski, 1996, From subduction to intra-continental transpression: structures of the Southern Kermadec-Hikurangi margin from multibeam bathymetry, side-scan sonar, and seismic reflection: Mar. Geophys. Res., v. 18, p. 357-381.

Katz, H. R., 1981, Probable Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate in continental slope east of the North Island, New Zealand: J. Petrol. Geol., v. 3, p. 315-324.

Pecher, I. A., and S. A. Henrys, 2003, Potential Previous HitgasNext Hit reserves in Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate sweet spots on the Hikurangi Margin, New Zealand, Science Report, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, 32 pp.

Xu, W., and C. D. Ruppel, 1999, Predicting the occurrence, distribution, and evolution of methane Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrate in porous marine sediments: J. Geophys. Res., v. 104, p. 5081-5095.

Figure 1. Distribution of BSRs on the Hikurangi margin. Lines 36 and 37 are shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2. Seismic lines GeodyNZ 36 and 37 (Collot et al., 1996), locations in Fig. 1, short-streamer high-resolution data collected with the R/V L’Atalante’s high-speed seismic system. TWT: two-way traveltime, CDP: common depth point. BSR strength is enhanced beneath anticlines (left) and at locations where layers crop out at the seafloor (right), both structures that are predicted to focus fluid flow. We suggest that such locations may represent Previous HitgasTop hydrate sweet spots.