--> Transformation and Interpretation of Seismic Data in the Wheeler Domain: Principles and Case Study Examples, by Friso Brouwer, David Connolly, Gert de Bruin, and Paul de Groot, #40314 (2008)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view presentation in PDF format.

Transformation and Interpretation of Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Data in the Wheeler Domain: Principles and Case Study Examples*

By

Friso Brouwer1, David Connolly1, Gert de Bruin1, and Paul de Groot1

Search and Discovery Article #40314 (2008)

Posted July 25, 2008

*Adapted from oral presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, San Antonio, Texas, April 20-23

1dGB-USA, Sugar Land, TX (mailto:[email protected])

Abstract

Previous HitSeismicNext Hit data is one of the important sources of sequence stratigraphic information. Despite (or due to) the richness of sequence stratigraphic information in Previous HitseismicNext Hit data, it is difficult to isolate, map, and interpret system tracts in 3D Previous HitseismicNext Hit data. However, once mapped in a Wheeler diagram, interpretation of system tracts, sea-level change, and shoreline shifts becomes much easier, ultimately facilitating the identification of source rock, reservoir-seal-couplets, and stratigraphic traps.

We will present a workflow illustrated with case study examples in which we semi-automatic construct a Wheeler-type diagram from Previous HitseismicNext Hit data and use a dual Previous HitseismicNext Hit/Wheeler display for system tract interpretation. Finally, we show how detailed stratigraphic features, such as channels and fans, can be mapped with ease in 3D Wheeler space.

The procedure depends on the accurate determination of the dip of Previous HitseismicNext Hit events, using a method called dip-steering. Subsequent step is the automated data driven tracking of chrono-stratigraphic horizons using the calculated dips from the previous step. The tracking is designed to honor horizon truncations at unconformable boundaries. Using the chrono-Previous HitstratigraphyNext Hit, we transform the data from the Previous HitseismicNext Hit domain to the Wheeler domain, including creation of hiatuses in areas of non-deposition and erosion. A simultaneous display of amplitude data (Previous HitseismicNext Hit character) and chrono-Previous HitstratigraphyNext Hit in the Previous HitseismicNext Hit domain and depositional trends in the Wheeler domain allows an easy and accurate interpretation of the system tracts and depositional style.

Using the information obtained in the previous step we build a 3D model-driven chrono-Previous HitstratigraphyNext Hit, again honoring unconformities. We use this to create a 3D Wheeler space, in which time slices are equivalent to horizons slices in the Previous HitseismicNext Hit domain.

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uConclusions

 

















uAbstract

uFigures

uConclusions

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selected Figures

 

Figure 1 Location map of case study.



Figure 2 Chrono-Previous HitstratigraphyNext Hit illustrated on Previous HitseismicNext Hit profile.

Figure 3 Previous HitSeismicNext Hit domain (left) and Wheeler domain (right).


Figure 4

Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Wheeler diagram.  

Figure 5

System tract interpretation.

Figure 5

Geomorphology — composite similarity + segmentation.

Conclusions

  • Examples showing integration latest Previous HitseismicTop interpretation techniques with well logs and regional geology.

  • Comprehensive analysis leading to a geological concept.

  • Interpretation analog.

  • Future analysis will expand and fine-tune interpretations.

Return to top