[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view presentation in PDF format.

 

Multiple-Point Statistics (MPS)/Facies Distribution Modeling (FDM) of Carbonates – an Isolated Platform Example*

By

Marjorie Levy1, Paul M. (Mitch) Harris1, and Sebastien Strebelle1

 

Search and Discovery Article #40292 (2008)

Posted July 30, 2008

 

*Adapted from oral presentation at the 2006 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, November 5-8, 2006.

Click to view list of articles adapted from presentations by P.M. (Mitch) Harris or by his co-workers and him at AAPG meetings from 2000 to 2008.

 

1 Chevron Energy Technology Company, San Ramon, California, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])

 

Abstract

We have explored the use of MPS/FDM modeling in a carbonate Previous HitreservoirNext Hit. We have modeled the platform top of an isolated platform example and tested various scenarios for the distribution of grainstone facies.

The training image is a 3D conceptual model of the Previous HitreservoirNext Hit, containing information about facies dimensions and relationships among facies. Five facies were considered:

  • Bar crest = best Previous HitreservoirNext Hit quality due to sorting in “highest energy” setting.
  • Bar flank = good Previous HitreservoirNext Hit quality between bar crests, includes flanks of bars and intervening tidal channels.
  • Island = localized areas where permeability is enhanced by dissolution during meteoric diagenesis.
  • Deeper platform = poorer Previous HitreservoirNext Hit quality in platform areas away from bars and channels.
  • Background = “tight” intervals due to muddier facies or to porosity-plugging cementation.

The facies probability cube allows controlling the spatial distribution of the facies in the MPS model. First, facies depocenter maps were generated for deeper platform, bar flank, bar crest and island. Then, the stratigraphy of the Previous HitreservoirNext Hit was modeled by digitizing a vertical proportion curve reflecting the variations of facies proportions with depth. Three alternative vertical proportion curves were created, representing, respectively:

  • a gradual trend,
  • cyclicity at the scale of composite sequences,
  • high cyclicity at the scale of individual sequences.

Corresponding alternative facies probability cubes were generated for these three cases.

Several scenarios were run: the gradual, cyclic, and highly cyclic cases; both narrow and wide bar crests and bar flanks; and with constant and variable azimuth. The wide bar crest/bar flank and very cyclic Previous HitsimulationNext Hit produce results that qualitatively appear most reasonable in both cross section and map views. Flow Previous HitsimulationNext Hit of the various models highlights their significant differences.

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase Previous HitstudyNext Hit

uSummary

uReference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase Previous HitstudyNext Hit

uSummary

uReference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase Previous HitstudyNext Hit

uSummary

uReference

 

 

Rationale of Project

  • Focus on isolated carbonate platform example.
  • Use modern analogs for conceptual faciesmodels.
  • Test application of current MPS/FDM tools to carbonate modeling.
  • Develop “new”tools specific for carbonates.

 

Choice of Case Previous HitStudyNext Hit

  • Build models based on Tengiz Previous HitreservoirNext Hit (Weber et al, 2003); not building actual model of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit.
  • Model only Bashkirian platform and test varied scenarios for distribution of grainstone facies.

 

Summary of Matches to Real Data

  • Matches facies regions of platform top which were defined during sequence stratigraphy framework development.
  • Matches stratigraphic variation defined during sequence stratigraphy studes with facies proportion curves.
  • Matches conceptual models for facies types from modern analogs with training images.
  • Generally matches facies identified in cored wells.

 

Reference

Weber, L.J., B.P. Francis, P.M. Harris, and M. Clark, 2003, Stratigraphy, lithofacies, and Previous HitreservoirTop distribution, Tengiz field, Kazakhstan: Permo-Carboniferous Carbonate Platforms and Reefs, SEPM Special Publication 78, p. 351-394.

 

Return to top.