[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view presentation in PDF format.

 

Multiple-Point Statistics (MPS)/Previous HitFaciesNext Hit Distribution Modeling (FDM) of Carbonates – an Isolated Platform Example*

By

Marjorie Levy1, Paul M. (Mitch) Harris1, and Sebastien Strebelle1

 

Search and Discovery Article #40292 (2008)

Posted July 30, 2008

 

*Adapted from oral presentation at the 2006 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Perth, Australia, November 5-8, 2006.

Click to view list of articles adapted from presentations by P.M. (Mitch) Harris or by his co-workers and him at AAPG meetings from 2000 to 2008.

 

1 Chevron Energy Technology Company, San Ramon, California, USA ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected])

 

Abstract

We have explored the use of MPS/FDM modeling in a Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit reservoir. We have modeled the platform top of an isolated platform example and tested various scenarios for the distribution of grainstone Previous HitfaciesNext Hit.

The training image is a 3D conceptual model of the reservoir, containing information about Previous HitfaciesNext Hit dimensions and relationships among Previous HitfaciesNext Hit. Five Previous HitfaciesNext Hit were considered:

  • Bar crest = best reservoir quality due to sorting in “highest energy” setting.
  • Bar flank = good reservoir quality between bar crests, includes flanks of bars and intervening tidal channels.
  • Island = localized areas where permeability is enhanced by dissolution during meteoric diagenesis.
  • Deeper platform = poorer reservoir quality in platform areas away from bars and channels.
  • Background = “tight” intervals due to muddier Previous HitfaciesNext Hit or to porosity-plugging cementation.

The Previous HitfaciesNext Hit probability cube allows controlling the spatial distribution of the Previous HitfaciesNext Hit in the MPS model. First, Previous HitfaciesNext Hit depocenter maps were generated for deeper platform, bar flank, bar crest and island. Then, the stratigraphy of the reservoir was modeled by digitizing a vertical proportion curve reflecting the variations of Previous HitfaciesNext Hit proportions with depth. Three alternative vertical proportion curves were created, representing, respectively:

  • a gradual trend,
  • cyclicity at the scale of composite sequences,
  • high cyclicity at the scale of individual sequences.

Corresponding alternative Previous HitfaciesNext Hit probability cubes were generated for these three cases.

Several scenarios were run: the gradual, cyclic, and highly cyclic cases; both narrow and wide bar crests and bar flanks; and with constant and variable azimuth. The wide bar crest/bar flank and very cyclic simulation produce results that qualitatively appear most reasonable in both cross section and map views. Flow simulation of the various models highlights their significant differences.

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase study

uSummary

uReference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase study

uSummary

uReference

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigures

uRationale

uCase study

uSummary

uReference

 

Selected Figures

Previous HitCarbonateNext Hit MPS/FDM modeling: Selection of case study—Tengiz field.

Stratigraphy and Previous HitfaciesNext Hit.

Previous HitFaciesNext Hit depocenter maps.

Vertical proportion curves.

Comparison of Previous HitfaciesNext Hit maps with MPS simulation.

 

Rationale of Project

  • Focus on isolated Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit platform example.
  • Use modern analogs for conceptual faciesmodels.
  • Test application of current MPS/FDM tools to Previous HitcarbonateNext Hit modeling.
  • Develop “new”tools specific for carbonates.

 

Choice of Case Study

  • Build models based on Tengiz reservoir (Weber et al, 2003); not building actual model of reservoir.
  • Model only Bashkirian platform and test varied scenarios for distribution of grainstone Previous HitfaciesNext Hit.

 

Summary of Matches to Real Data

  • Matches Previous HitfaciesNext Hit regions of platform top which were defined during sequence stratigraphy framework development.
  • Matches stratigraphic variation defined during sequence stratigraphy studes with Previous HitfaciesNext Hit proportion curves.
  • Matches conceptual models for Previous HitfaciesNext Hit types from modern analogs with training images.
  • Generally matches Previous HitfaciesNext Hit identified in cored wells.

 

Reference

Weber, L.J., B.P. Francis, P.M. Harris, and M. Clark, 2003, Stratigraphy, lithofacies, and reservoir distribution, Tengiz field, Kazakhstan: Permo-Carboniferous Previous HitCarbonateTop Platforms and Reefs, SEPM Special Publication 78, p. 351-394.

 

Return to top.