Click to view article as PDF file.
GCCellular Wireless Seismic Data Acquisition*
By
Bob Hardage1
Search and Discovery Article # 40233 (2007)
Posted March 15, 2007
*Adapted from the Geophysical Corner column, prepared by the author and entitled “Hello, This Is Your Geophone Calling,” in AAPG Explorer, February, 2007. Editor of Geophysical Corner is Bob A. Hardage. Managing Editor of AAPG Explorer is Vern Stefanic; Larry Nation is Communications Director.
1Bureau of Economic Geology, Austin, Texas ([email protected] )
General Statement
We all know how cellular wireless telephones have spread around the world. “Cell” phones are in every nook and cranny of the earth and are used by people of all ages, nationalities, and professions. This same cellular wireless technology has now entered the onshore seismic data-acquisition world.
Just as a distant friend using a cell
phone can cause a system of radio-tower relays to reach your cell phone and
leave a message or transmit a graphic image, a small cellular wireless
unit
attached to a geophone can transmit the data recorded by that geophone through a
system of radio antennae to a central data-storage
unit
.
uGeneral StatementuFigure CaptionsuMechanismuAdvantageuConclusion
uGeneral StatementuFigure CaptionsuMechanismuAdvantageuConclusion
uGeneral StatementuFigure CaptionsuMechanismuAdvantageuConclusion
|
MechanismA system that acquires seismic data using cellular wireless technology is similar to a cellular telephone system in a large city. Inside the hypothetical city limits shown in Figure 1a, several radio towers create overlapping reception/broadcast areas that combine to cover the city. Through a connection of radio towers, a cellphone user at A can talk to, or transmit digital information to, a second cellphone user at B. The diagram implies that A and B exchange information via pass-along communication links 1, 2, 3, and 4, which span many miles.
In wireless
seismic data acquisition, a geophone is connected directly to a small,
wireless, remote acquisition
Wireless
cellular seismic systems made by current manufacturers differ in how
they handle the data received from geophones. In some systems, each RAU
transmits its data to a central data-storage
In other
systems, data stay in the RAU and are downloaded to a data-storage
AdvantageThe attraction of cellular wireless seismic data acquisition is that cables are eliminated. In some onshore 3-D seismic surveys, easily 200 to 600 miles of cable can be deployed to connect a large acquisition template of thousands of receiver stations. In terms of weight, volume, and number of support vehicles and crew, cables are the major equipment component of a cable-based data-acquisition system.In a cellular wireless system, the geophone connects directly to the RAU (Figure 2). There are no cables to connect the RAUs to a central recorder or to connect a RAU to its assigned geophone.Some think that this absence of cables is a weakness of wireless systems, not an asset, because cables ensure a high-data transmission rate. Both schools of thought have good arguing points.
ConclusionCable-based seismic data acquisition systems have been used forever, are great technology, and will continue to be used for years. However, the new kid on the block, cellular wireless data acquisition, looks bullish and will no doubt become popular with some seismic crews.
|
