uGeneral Statement

uFigure Captions

uMechanism

uAdvantage

uConclusion

uGeneral Statement

uFigure Captions

uMechanism

uAdvantage

uConclusion

uGeneral Statement

uFigure Captions

uMechanism

uAdvantage

uConclusion

Figure captions

Mechanism

A system that acquires seismic data using cellular wireless technology is similar to a cellular telephone system in a large city. Inside the hypothetical city limits shown in Figure 1a, several radio towers create overlapping reception/broadcast areas that combine to cover the city. Through a connection of radio towers, a cellphone user at A can talk to, or transmit digital information to, a second cellphone user at B. The diagram implies that A and B exchange information via pass-along communication links 1, 2, 3, and 4, which span many miles.

In wireless seismic data acquisition, a geophone is connected directly to a small, wireless, remote acquisition unit (RAU) that functions essentially the same as a common cell phone (Figure 2). The RAU has an accurate internal clock that is synchronized with the internal clocks in all other RAUs across the seismic spread. Each RAU also has an internal GPS receiver that adds precise earth coordinates to all data acquired by its assigned geophone. The seismic signal from the geophone is digitized by the RAU and then stored in flash memory – the same type of memory used in cell phones functioning as cameras that acquire, transmit, and receive photographs.  

Wireless cellular seismic systems made by current manufacturers differ in how they handle the data received from geophones. In some systems, each RAU transmits its data to a central data-storage unit via a system of overlapping radio-antennae patterns. In Figure 1b, the data transmission from geophone station C to data-storage unit D occurs via pass-along protocols between radio antennae a, b, c, and d.  

In other systems, data stay in the RAU and are downloaded to a data-storage unit at appropriate time intervals. In one option, each RAU is physically transported to a local data-storage device and then returned to its assigned geophone station. In yet other systems, a technician visits each RAU at selected times with a PC and uses a data wand to dump data from the RAU memory into the PC.

Advantage 

The attraction of cellular wireless seismic data acquisition is that cables are eliminated. In some onshore 3-D seismic surveys, easily 200 to 600 miles of cable can be deployed to connect a large acquisition template of thousands of receiver stations. In terms of weight, volume, and number of support vehicles and crew, cables are the major equipment component of a cable-based data-acquisition system. 

In a cellular wireless system, the geophone connects directly to the RAU (Figure 2). There are no cables to connect the RAUs to a central recorder or to connect a RAU to its assigned geophone. 

Some think that this absence of cables is a weakness of wireless systems, not an asset, because cables ensure a high-data transmission rate. Both schools of thought have good arguing points.

Conclusion 

Cable-based seismic data acquisition systems have been used forever, are great technology, and will continue to be used for years. However, the new kid on the block, cellular wireless data acquisition, looks bullish and will no doubt become popular with some seismic crews.

Return to top.