--> Uses, Abuses, and Examples of Seismic-Derived Acoustic Impedance Data: What Does the Interpreter Need to Know?
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view page image in pdf format.


AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 90 (2006), Program Abstracts (Digital)

7th Middle East Geosciences Conference and Exhibition
Manama, Bahrain
March 27-29, 2006

ABSTRACT: Uses, Abuses, and Examples of Previous HitSeismicNext Hit-Derived Acoustic Impedance Data: What Does the Interpreter Need to Know?

Rebecca Latimer
Chevron, 19718 Laurel Park Lane, Houston, TX 77094, phone: 713-854-6994, [email protected]

Inversion of Previous HitseismicNext Hit data into acoustic impedance provides a natural tie to the log impedance data and forces the geoscientist, in analyzing Previous HitseismicNext Hit data, to extract appropriate wavelets, determine the Previous HitphaseNext Hit and amplitude of the data, determine whether or not the Previous HitphaseNext Hit is stable throughout the volume, and very intimately tie the well log impedance data to the Previous HitseismicNext Hit data. Utilizing inverted data at the beginning of the interpretation process requires that the geoscientist understand the rock properties in their target area before embarking on an “attribute” interpretation. Even when the P impedance data do not clearly distinguish between fluids or lithologies, value is added by using these data as the first interpretation tool. The simplicity in knowing that the change of values represents a change in rock properties without the complexity of wavelet variability is a distinct advantage to the interpreter and the sequence stratigrapher. This initial process is critical to undertaking any interpretation of Previous HitseismicNext Hit data. Inverted data, a layer property, are a more intuitive geologic tool that allows interpreters to utilize their natural ability to “see” the geology in the Previous HitseismicNext Hit data.

This presentation will demonstrate the necessity for inversion and explain why it is beneficial in an interpretation and sequence stratigraphic workflow. It will examine both the strengths and drawbacks of using inverted data as compared with the Previous HitseismicTop data and the original rock data. It will also show:

  • how scale differences between various data types can effect the results,
  • how the interpreter and the sequence stratigrapher utilize the inverted data and
  • how to spot pitfalls in the overuse of impedance data.

 

Copyright © 2006. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All Rights Reserved.