Organic Carbon Deposition in Gyre Versus Eddy Oceans*
By
William W. Hay1
Search and Discovery Article #40215 (2006)
Posted October 16, 2006
*Oral presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, Houston, Texas, April 9-12, 2006
Click to view presentation in PDF format (~11.2 mb). For better
viewing results, view offline by using right-mouse click and "save target as".
1University of Colorado - Emeritus, Estes Park, CO ([email protected])
Abstract
Today's
ocean
is characterized by shallow
anticyclonic gyres that extend from the equatorial region to 45o
N and S, and deeply convecting cyclonic gyres in the polar regions. These gyre
systems are separated by fronts where water enters the
ocean
interior to form
the thermocline and intermediate water masses that floor the anticyclonic gyres.
This
ocean
structure depends on steady westerly winds centered on 45 o
latitude induced by persistent high polar atmospheric pressure forced by the
presence of polar ice. This gyre
ocean
is well ventilated and organic carbon
deposition is limited to upwelling regions along the equator and low to
mid-latitude eastern margins of the
ocean
basins.
Without ice there would be no persistent polar
atmospheric highs. The westerly winds would not be constant but would be
replaced by light and variable winds during much of the year. The structure of
the
ocean
would be very different. The oceanic large gyres and frontal systems
would be replaced by an array of mesoscale eddies pumping water upward and
downward according to their rotation. The
ocean
interior would become relatively
unstructured and poorly ventilated, with nutrients more widely distributed. High
productivity, anoxic conditions, and organic carbon deposition could occur
throughout the
ocean
. Moving eddies would be steered by bottom topography as in
the Circum-Antarctic Current today. Other eddies would be relatively stable,
like the Socotra Gyre and Great Whirl in the western Indian
Ocean
today. Stable
cyclonic eddy sites and tracks would become loci of organic carbon deposition.
Selected Figures
|
Comparison of icehouse and greenhouse |
