[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Mass Transport Deposits: Combined Outcrop Studies, 3-D Seismic Interpretation and Forward Modeling

Benjamin Kneller1, Mason Dykstra2, Philip Thompson1, Vanessa Ketznus1, Magdalena Szuman1, Katerina Garyfalou1, Matteo Molinaro1, Mads Huuse1, Peter Butterworth3, David Macdonald1, and Juan Pablo Milana4
1 University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
2 University of California, Santa Barbara, CA
3 BP Egypt, Cairo, Egypt
4 Universidad de La Serena, La Serena, Chile

The shallow parts of Previous Hit3DNext Hit seismic Previous HitsurveysNext Hit offer outstanding views of the three-dimensional structure of mass transport deposits, but with little or no well calibration to establish lithology or core/outcrop scale structure – both of which are essential to an understanding of the properties and origin of the deposit. Truly seismic-scale outcrops of mass transport deposits are rather rare, but study of the rock record is vital to the Previous HitacquisitionNext Hit of an understanding of their structural evolution, lithofacies distribution and reservoir or barrier potential. We present some models of architecture and lithologic distribution based on a combination of very large scale outcrops and Previous Hit3DNext Hit seismic, which we have used to generate seismic forward models. These are based on two end-member types of deposit; a Mesozoic slide complex in Antarctica (MacDonald et al., 1993), and a chaotic debris flow of Carboniferous age in NW Argentina, the latter mapped in detail in Previous Hit3DTop using laser-based digital mapping techniques. We discuss the relations between the macro- (seismic) and meso- (outcrop/core) scales of observation of structure and lithofacies distribution, and suggest some preliminary approaches to subsurface prediction.

Macdonald, D.I.M, Moncrieff, A.C.M. and Butterworth, P.J., 1993. Giant slide deposits from a Mesozoic fore-arc basin, Alexander Island, Antarctica. Geology; November 1993; v. 21; no. 11; p. 1047-1050.