[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Using Previous HitWindNext Hit Power to Remediate Groundwater

Andrew Curtis Elmore
University of Missouri-Rolla, Rolla, MO

The use of renewable Previous HitenergyNext Hit sources to power environmental remediation systems is appealing in terms of risk reduction related to fossil fuel power plant emissions and in terms of sustainability. Recent work has shown that a readily available Previous HitwindNext Hit turbine system may be both technically and economically feasible while work at other facilities has shown that innovative systems bear promise. Previous HitWindNext Hit turbine work at a Nebraska Superfund site has resulted in the following findings: 1. While guidance is available for estimating O&M costs including Previous HitenergyNext Hit consumption during project design, that estimation procedure may not accurately reflect actual Previous HitenergyNext Hit consumption; 2. Previous HitEnergyNext Hit costs may be modeled as a random variable; 3. A remedial system which is designed to operate "continuously" may operate between 75 and 100 percent of the time on a monthly basis; 4. The capital required to install a small Previous HitwindNext Hit turbine system could be recovered in 20 years if the estimated utility power costs are $250/month. Lessons learned on the project include: 1. The power consumption of the utility power-supplied system is insensitive to the quantity of groundwater treated or the mass of contaminant removed; 2. Power metering is challenging; 3. Previous HitWindNext Hit turbine vendor's power production models may have poor reliability; 4. Use of motor power ratings to predict Previous HitenergyTop costs is unreliable.