Click
to article in PDF format.
Petroleum Mass-Balance of the Neuquén
Basin
, Argentina: A Comparative Assessment of the Productive Districts and
Non-Productive Trends*
By
Leonardo Legarreta1, Carlos E. Cruz2, Gustavo Vergani3, Guillermo A. Laffitte4, and Héctor J. Villar5
Search and Discovery Article #10081 (2005)
Posted May 1, 2005
*Adapted from extended abstract prepared for presentation at AAPG International Conference & Exhibition, Cancun, Mexico, October 24-27, 2004.
1Patagonia Exploración, BsAs, Argentina
2Pluspetrol, BsAs, Argentina;
3Repsol YPF, BsAs, Argentina
5FCEyN-Dep. Cs.Geol., UBA-Conicet, BsAs, Argentina
Summary
The effort of
eight decades of exploration and development in the Neuquén
Basin
(west-central Argentina) has identified a EUR of 9.7 BBOE, with a current
daily production around 360 MBO and 2.6 BCFG. As result of the
de-regularization and privatization process during the 90’s, the oil and gas
reserves increased within the relatively mature productive tracts (Figure
1), where the known plays contain around 1.9 BBO and 17.5 TCFG of proven
and probable reserves. Additional reserves are expected from testing new
play
concepts outside the areas under production, as well as from future
activities in the under-explored fold belt and from the eastern margin of
the
basin
(on the Pampean foreland).
|
|
Focus of StudyThis work focuses on a quantitative comparison of the known productive districts by analyzing the geological elements and the processes involved in the charge, migration, accumulation, and preservation of hydrocarbons. The quantification of the generation-accumulation efficiency of the four charge systems, known as Puesto Kauffman and Los Molles (Early-Middle Jurassic), Vaca Muerta (Late Jurassic), and Agrio (Early Cretaceous), along with the geological knowledge of the proven areas, allowed our estimate of the remaining exploratory potential (Figures 1 and 2).
Geologic HistoryThe Jurassic and Cretaceous accumulation took place within a partially enclosed marine backarc depocenter that formed on the convergent western side of the South America plate, linked to the Pacific Ocean. Relative sea-level oscillations played a critical role in the development of sources, reservoirs, and seals, governed by an extensional tectonic regime. During relative highstands a relatively shallow sea, where organic-rich shales were deposited under sub-oxic to anoxic conditions, occupied the Neuquén embayment. Under shelfal-to-nearshore and fluvial environments, carbonate and clastic high-quality reservoirs accumulated (Figure 2). Relative low position of the base level resulted in a very restricted link through the magmatic arc or complete disconnection with the Pacific Ocean. Under this new scenario, the accumulation area dramatically shrank and the backarc depocenter became a realm prone to evaporite (seal) and fluvial and eolian sandstone (reservoir) accumulation (Figure 3). The
effects of the Andean compressive deformation of the sedimentary pile
started to be noticeable in latest Paleocene and became very strong
during the Neogene (Figure 2). However,
synsedimentary deformation related to old tectonic features, present in
the Paleozoic substratum, resulted in the creation of structural and
combined traps very early in the tectonic evolution of the Neuquén
Source RocksThree
high-quality and thick marine organic-rich intervals cover most of the
The
overall pattern of the kerogen-transformation-ratio (TR) maps shown in
Figures 4, 5,
and 6 and the trends in
Figure 7 depict the geographic location of
the hydrocarbon kitchens of the source rocks through time and illustrate
the final migration from the present deep positions to the The timing of the process critically affected the possibility of hydrocarbon accumulation and preservation. Los Molles source rock experienced its almost entire conversion to hydrocarbons from late Early Cretaceous to Early Tertiary times, whereas Vaca Muerta evolved during the Late Cretaceous and Miocene. The late thermal evolution of Agrio covered the Eocene to late Miocene. Hydrocarbons generated in the more mature portions of the western area, therefore, experienced limited chances for accumulation and preservation in the traps formed during Tertiary tectonics. This deficiency in timing strongly disfavored hydrocarbon pools in the current fold belt (Area 1 of Figure 7), mainly those sourced from Los Molles and Vaca Muerta intervals. Conversely, trap development and adequate timing locally favored relatively higher efficiency along the fringe of the Neuquén embayment (Areas 2 and 3 of Figure 7), including the Huincul High area (Area 4 of Figure 7), where traps were developed through Jurassic and Cretaceous times.
Mass Balance EstimationsOn a
generalized basis and considering the total depositional area of the
three source intervals, mass balance estimations are indicative of low
generation-accumulation efficiencies at a The
aforementioned low efficiency could indicate that most of the
hydrocarbons were lost (over 97%), or at least, not preserved within
commercially producible accumulations. When the analysis is performed
individually in each productive district, the obtained
Generation-Accumulation Efficiency (GAE) numbers show some improvement,
but the total gap at the base scale is still huge. It is necessary to
keep in mind that the potential resources have not been included in the
calculations; they will affect the final efficiency number.
Misunderstanding of the petroleum systems and possible biases in the
present Within
unexplored or under-explored areas, large pools could be provided by
additional future exploration of the less investigated plays, such as in
the western thrust belt, where post-mature gas generation may have
charged deep reservoirs in large structures. Also, hydrocarbon resources
can be envisioned within the practically unexplored deeply seated traps
and |
