--> Utility of Rocky Mountain Tight Gas Sand Resource Assessments: Data Sources, Methodologies and End Users, by John B. Curtis
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

AAPG Bulletin, Vol. 89 (2005). Program Abstracts (Digital).

AAPG Hedberg Conference
Vail, Colorado
April 24-29, 2005

ABSTRACT: Utility of Rocky Mountain Previous HitTightNext Hit Previous HitGasNext Hit Sand Resource Assessments: Data Sources, Methodologies and End Users

John B. Curtis
Potential Previous HitGasNext Hit Agency, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401

Projections by United States government and Previous HitgasNext Hit industry research organizations indicate that U.S. Previous HitgasNext Hit consumption could increase up to 40% from the current 23 trillion cubic feet by the year 2025. The Rocky Mountain region contains the largest remaining Lower-48 potential Previous HitgasNext Hit resource, outside of the U. S. Gulf Coast. The bulk of this assessed resource is thought to be present in Previous HittightNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit sands or coal seams. With a projected decline in more conventional U.S. Previous HitgasNext Hit production, and a stabilization or decline in Canadian imports, these resources are assumed to be the next Previous HitgasNext Hit supply increment available (and required) to meet the Nation’s needs, prior to the possible delivery of Alaskan Previous HitgasNext Hit, expansion of LNG imports and any future exploitation of natural Previous HitgasNext Hit hydrates.

Recent work by the geologic community has questioned both the existence and producibility of significant Previous HittightNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit sand resources. In turn, this controversy directly impacts the validity and utility of published resource assessments.

This paper examines Rocky Mountain Previous HittightNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit sand resource assessments completed by the U.S. Geological Survey, Energy Information Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy, National Petroleum Council and the U.S. Potential Previous HitGasTop Committee. The practical utility of these assessments is considered in light of:

  • Data sources employed by each organization
  • Scale of assessment unit – formation, play or province-level
  • Assessment methodologies
  • The requirements of end users – E&P companies, the financial community and public policy decision makers.

Copyright ©2005. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All Rights Reserved.