AAPG Hedberg Conference
Vail, Colorado
April 24-29, 2005
Basin
Centered
Gas
” Production and Resource Assessment
1 The Discovery Group Inc., Denver, CO
2 Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, KS
Tight
gas
sands behave differently than conventional reservoirs. Two petrophysical properties stand out. The first is the strong stress dependence of permeability that is well documented. The second, involving relative permeability, is not widely known or documented but its effects are widely observed. Core data show that as absolute
in-situ permeability drops from the millidarcy into the tens of microdarcies range, the critical
gas
saturation (Sgc, the
gas
saturation necessary for
gas
flow at measurable rates) increases and the critical water saturation (Swc, the water saturation necessary for water flow at measurable rates) also increases. Viewed in a common water saturation space the two critical saturations move apart with decreasing permeability, producing a widening range of water saturations at which both phases are effectively immobile. We informally call this no-flow region “permeability jail.”
The recognition of permeability jail has enormous implications for the
basin
centered
gas
model, and evaluation of resources. This model is interpreted by some to imply that
gas
is ubiquitous and production is limited only by technology and stimulation. If large sections of rock are low-permeability and in “permeability jail” the presence of
gas
may not translate to recoverable resource. Further, if higher permeability intervals are the carrier beds for
gas
production from adjoining low-permeability sections, then a consequence is that these intervals will exhibit lower
Swc values and will be more prone to water production. “Sweetspot” exploration strategies may therefore have the unexpected consequence of having to deal with higher water production rates.
Copyright ©2005. The American Association of Petroleum Geologists. All Rights Reserved.