[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Click to view article as PDF

 

Previous HitGeochemicalNext Hit Prospecting of Hydrocarbons in Frontier Basins of India*

By

B. Kumar1, D.J. Patil1, G. Kalpana1, and C. Vishnu Vardhan1

 

 Search and Discovery Article #10073 (2004)

 

 *Adapted from extended abstract prepared for presentation at AAPG Annual Convention, Dallas, Texas, April 18-21, 2004.   

 1National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad – 500 007, India ([email protected])

 

Abstract

India has 26 sedimentary basins with a basinal area of approximately 1.8x 106 km2 (excluding deep waters), out of which seven are producing basins and two have proven potential. Exploration efforts in other basins, called “frontier basins” are in progress. These basins are characterized by varied geology, age, tectonics, and depositional environments. Hydrocarbon shows in many of these basins are known, and in few basins oil and gas have flowed in commercial /non-commercial quantities. Within the framework of India Hydrocarbon Vision – 2025 and New Exploration Licensing Policy, there is a continuous increase in area under active exploration. The asset management concept with multi-disciplinary teams has created a demand for synergic application of risk-reduction technologies, including Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit surveys.

 

National Geophysical Research Institute (NGRI), Hyderabad, India has initiated/planned Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit surveys composed of gas chromatographic and carbon isotopic analyses in few of the frontier basins of India. The adsorbed soil gas data in one of the basins (Saurashtra basin, Gujarat) has shown varied concentrations of CH4 to C4H10. The C1 concentration varies between 3 to 766 ppb and Σ C2+, 1 to 543 ppb. This basin has thin soil cover and the Mesozoic sediments (probable source rocks) are overlain by thick cover of Deccan Traps. The scope and perspective of Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit surveys in frontier basins of India are presented here.

 

 

uAbstract

uFigure captions

uIntroduction

uGeology

uProcedures

uResults

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigure captions

uIntroduction

uGeology

uProcedures

uResults

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigure captions

uIntroduction

uGeology

uProcedures

uResults

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uAbstract

uFigure captions

uIntroduction

uGeology

uProcedures

uResults

uReferences

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figures Captions

Return to top.

Introduction

Hydrocarbons generated and trapped beneath the Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit seep or leak to the Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit in varying but detectable quantities. These phenomena occur because processes and mechanisms such as diffusion, effusion, and buoyancy allow hydrocarbons to escape from reservoirs and migrate to the Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit where they may be retained in the sediments and soils or diffuse into atmosphere or water columns (Klusman, 1993; Schumacher and Abrams, 1996). Based on these assumptions, various techniques of Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit prospecting for hydrocarbons have been developed to identify the Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit or near-Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit occurrences of hydrocarbons. Previous HitSurfaceNext Hit Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit prospecting for hydrocarbons consist of direct and indirect methods to identify the microseepage. These methods include adsorbed soil gas surveys, microbial techniques, soil salts, bitumen, and trace element techniques, helium emanometry, etc. In order to meet the challenges of India Hydrocarbon Vision 2025 for Exploration & Production sector, a National Facility for Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit prospecting of hydrocarbons has been nucleated at NGRI with a grant from Oil Industry Development Board (OIDB), New Delhi (Kumar et al., 2002a). As a part of this National Facility and under its own Research & Development program, NGRI is carrying-out/planning to carry-out Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit surveys for hydrocarbon prospecting in the frontier onland/offshore basins of India. Adsorbed soil gas surveys have been completed in Vindhyan basin (Chambal Valley) and Kutch onland basin, Gujarat (Kumar et al., 2002b, 2003), and the work in Saurashtra basin is in progress. The results of adsorbed soil gas analyses for light gaseous hydrocarbons in one of the frontier basin (Saurashtra basin) and the future strategies for Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit surveys in other frontier basins of India are discussed.

 

Geology and Tectonics of Saurashtra Basin

Saurashtra basin, Gujarat, consists of mostly Mesozoic and Cenozoic rocks (Biswas, 1983; Merh, 1995), and stratigraphically the sequence begins with Cretaceous to be followed upward by the Deccan volcanics, Tertiary and the Quaternary (Figure 1a) The area is largely covered and prominently exposed by the Deccan Trap (basaltic rocks), whose thickness varies from few hundreds to thousands of meters. Traps are underlain by thick Mesozoic sediments (100- 4000 m), which can form potential source rocks. Deccan Trap volcanicity during Late Cretaceous may have generated the requisite thermal conditions and acted as a catalyst in Mesozoic hydrocarbon-generation process. Sedimentation in marine intertonguing environments is considered to have been favorable phenomena for hydrocarbon generation and entrapment. The basin is bounded by three intersecting rift trends, Delhi (NE-SW), Narmada (ENE-WSW) and Dharwar (NNW-SSE). Integrated geophysical studies show that two of the sub-basins of Saurashtra, namely Jamnagar and Dwarka, have significant sediment thicknesses below the Deccan traps and can be considered for future hydrocarbon research.

 

Soil Sampling and Analytical Procedure

Soil samples from Jamnagar and Dwarka sub basins of Gujarat have been collected in the depth range of 1.2 – 3.5 m using manual augers. The soil cores collected were wrapped in aluminum foils and sealed in poly-metal packs. A total of ~290 soil samples were collected in two phases of field work. The sample location map of the area is given in Figure 1b. In the first and second phase the samples were collected in intervals of 5km and 2 km intervals, respectively, along existing roads.

One gram of soil sample is reacted in vacuum with orthophosphoric acid to desorb the soil gases. The CO2 released was trapped in KOH solution and the light gaseous hydrocarbons are collected by water displacement in a graduated tube fitted with rubber septa. The volume of desorbed gases is recorded, and 500 µl of desorbed gas sample is injected into the Nucon 5765 Gas Chromatograph fitted with ¼" glass-packed column (squalane), programmable temperature controller, and flame ionization detector. The GC was calibrated by using an external standard with known concentrations of methane, ethane, propane, i-butane and n-butane. The quantitative estimation of light gaseous hydrocarbon constituents in each sample was made using peak area measurement as a basis, and the correction for moisture content was applied. The accuracy of measurement of C1 to C4 components is < 1 ng/g.

 

Results and Discussion

The light gaseous hydrocarbon concentrations (CH4, C2H6, C3H8, i-C4H10 and n-C4H10) in soil samples of Jamnagar sub basin vary from 3 to 766, 3 to 261, 9 to 173, 8 to 45 and 5 to 118, in ppb, respectively. The Dwarka sub basin soils are characterized by C1-C4 concentrations in the range of 9 to 145, 3 to 130, 2 to 69, 4 to 29 and 6 to 82, in ppb, respectively. Figure 2 depicts the crossplots between C1-C2, C1-C3, C2-C3 and C1-ΣC2+, showing linear correlation. This indicates that the light hydrocarbon components may have migrated from a thermogenic source, and the effect of secondary alteration during their seepage toward the Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit may be insignificant. Pixler (1969) proposed a variation diagram using the ratios of C1/C2 and C1/C3, etc. to distinguish the non-productive zone from that of oil/gas producing zone. The discrimination diagram of Pixler for samples of Jamnagar and Dwarka sub basins in which methane, ethane, and propane were present suggest that ~70% of these samples fall in the oil-producing zone and the rest in the gas zone. The concentration of ΣC2+ is plotted in Figure 3 into three groups (i.e., ΣC2+ >100 ppb, ΣC2+  = 50-100 ppb, and ΣC2+ <50 ppb) and shows that the samples around Jamnagar, Kalavad, and Lalpur are characterized by higher ΣC2+ values. This suggests that hydrocarbon generation has taken place in the basin and the area may prove to be warm for future hydrocarbon exploration. The present Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit data support the earlier geological and geophysical findings.

The adsorbed soil gas surveys carried out by NGRI for Directorate General of Hydrocarbons, New Delhi in Vindhyan basin (Chambal Valley) and Kutch onland basin have also demarcated the warm areas for hydrocarbon research and exploration. The efforts to conduct detailed Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit surveys in other frontier basins of India are in progress.

 

References

Biswas, S.K., and Deshpande, S.V., 1983, Geology and Hydrocarbon Prospects of Kutch, Saurashtra and Narmada Basins. In: Bhandari, L. L. et al. (Ed.), Petroliferous Basins of India, pp. 111-126.

Klusman, R.W., 1993, Soil Gas and Related Methods for Natural Resource Exploration. John Wiley & Sons, England, 473 pp.

Kumar, B., Patil, D.J. and Kalpana, G., 2002a, National Facility for studies on Previous HitsurfaceNext Hit Previous HitgeochemicalNext Hit prospecting of hydrocarbons. 9th Annual India Oil and Gas Review Symposium, 9-10 Sept. 2002, Mumbai, pp. 274-278.

Kumar, B., Das Sharma, S., Patil, D.J., Sreenivas, B., Raju, S.V., Kalpana, G., and Madhavi, M., 2002b, Adsorbed Soil Gas Surveys for Hydrocarbon Research and Exploration in western part of Vindhyan Basin, Chambal valley.” Submitted to Directorate General of Hydrocarbons, New Delhi. Unpubl. Tech Rep. No. NGRI- 2002-Exp-361.

Kumar, B., Das Sharma, S., Patil, D.J., Sreenivas, B., Raju, S.V., Kalpana, G., Panicker, S.K., and Vishnu Vardhan, C., 2003, Adsorbed Soil Gas Surveys for Hydrocarbon Research and Exploration in parts of Kutch onland basin, Gujarat. Submitted to Directorate General of Hydrocarbons, New Delhi. Unpubl. Tech Rep. No. NGRI-2002-Exp-400.

Merh, S.S., 1995, Geology of Gujarat, Geological Society of India, Bangalore, 222 pp.

Pixler, B.O., 1969, Formation evaluation by analysis of hydrocarbon ratios. Journal Petroleum Technology, v. 21, pp. 665-670.

Schumacher, D., and Abrams, M.A., 1996, Hydrocarbon Migration and its Near Previous HitSurfaceNext Hit Previous HitExpressionTop, AAPG Memoir 66, 446 pp.

Sreenivasan, S., and D.M. Khar, 1995, Frontier basin exploration in India- Perspectives and challenges. Proceedings of the First International Conference & Exhibition Petrotech 1995, pp. 1-20.

Return to top.