[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

  Click to view article in PDF format.

 

Extensional Folding in the Eastern Venezuela Basin: Examples from Fields of Oritupano-Leona Block*

By

Jesús S. Porras1, Eduardo L. Vallejo1, Denis Marchal1, and Carlos Selva1 

Search and Discovery Article #50003 (2003)

 

*Adapted from “extended abstract” for presentation at the AAPG Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas, March 10-13, 2002.  

1Pérez Companc, Caracas, Venezuela

 

Introduction 

A large variety of folds have been identified in the Oritupano-Leona area. The Oritupano-Leona Block is located at the Greater Oficina Trend (Figure 1). More than 12 isolated oil fields constitute the block. Structurally, the fields are located in the southern flank of the Eastern Venezuela Basin (EVB), in the foredeep platform zone (Parnaud et al., 1995) (Figure 1). The field is affected by normal faulting mainly trending N60°E (Figure 2). Productive section is represented by the Oficina Formation (Early Miocene) (Figure 2), although uppermost reservoirs of the underlying Merecure Formation (Oligocene) have produced an acceptable volume of oil. Cumulative oil production of the block is over 340 MMbbls since its discovery in the1940’s. Reservoirs are composed of sandstones of estuarine to shallow-marine environments. 

Detailed 3D seismic interpretation distinguished various types of folds in the area: normal- and reverse-drag fold, composite fold structure and folds related to plastic flow. Longitudinal folds that include normal- and reverse-drag folds are common features in several fields and reported by different workers (Mencher et al., 1953; González de Juana et al., 1980; Azalgara et al., 2000; Porras et al., 2001). These folds are responsible for major oil accumulations. Normal-drag folds form the largest, with extended reservoirs in the footwall of master normal faults (Azalgara et al., 2000), whereas reverse-drag folds provide the structural closure for trapping in the hanging wall, especially in Leona Field (Porras et al., 2001). Composite fold structures and folds related to plastic flow are also described. The Junta field trap is a complex structure formed by a combination of folds related to normal Previous HitfaultNext Hit growth, linkage, and interaction.

 

uIntroduction

uFigure captions

uStructural framework

tNormal-drag folds

tReverse-drag folds

tComposite fold structures

tPlastic flow

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uIntroduction

uFigure captions

uStructural framework

tNormal-drag folds

tReverse-drag folds

tComposite fold structures

tPlastic flow

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uIntroduction

uFigure captions

uStructural framework

tNormal-drag folds

tReverse-drag folds

tComposite fold structures

tPlastic flow

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uIntroduction

uFigure captions

uStructural framework

tNormal-drag folds

tReverse-drag folds

tComposite fold structures

tPlastic flow

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

uIntroduction

uFigure captions

uStructural framework

tNormal-drag folds

tReverse-drag folds

tComposite fold structures

tPlastic flow

uConclusions

uReferences

uAcknowledgments

 

 

 

Figure Captions 

Figure 1. Oritupano-Leona location map. The study area is located on the southern flank of the Eastern Venezuela Basin, in the foredeep platform zone.

 

Figure 2. Map showing normal-Previous HitfaultNext Hit trends and major oil fields in the Oritupano-Leona Block, along with a highly reduced log of the Oficina Formation and overlying and underlying units.

 

Figure 3. Different features of folding in Oritupano-Leona Block. a) Normal-drag folds. b) Reverse-drag folds. c) and d) Composite fold structures. e) Folding by plastic flow. See inset for location of sections. A: anticlinal structure, S: synclinal structure, HW: hanging wall, FW: footwall.

 

 

Figure 4. Junta field structure. a) Time map of Base Oficina. b) Line drawing with the interpretation of the structural elements.

 

 

Click to view sequence of time map and line drawing.

 

Structural Framework 

The southern flank of the Eastern Venezuelan Basin represents a relative stable region characterized by extensional tectonics. The study area shows a regional dip about 4° North. The Previous HitfaultNext Hit Previous HitplanesNext Hit display a general planar geometry and dip around 45°. Two main Previous HitfaultNext Hit systems are identified; they follow a NE-SW and a W-E trend (Figure 2). Both main Previous HitfaultNext Hit systems control trapping. 

The first Previous HitfaultNext Hit system is parallel to the southern hinge of the basin. The NE-SW Previous HitfaultNext Hit system has synthetic dips, with dipping Previous HitplanesNext Hit to NW. The Previous HitfaultNext Hit Previous HitplanesNext Hit affect the whole section, including the basement. In general, this system corresponds to regional lineaments and shows syn-sedimentary characters. The Guara-Leona and Junta-Merey trends correspond to this system (Figure 2). Previous HitFaultNext Hit throws can reach 1000 feet. Their origin is associated to the flexural uplift which affected the basin during the Oligocene-Miocene times (Elrich and Barrett, 1992). 

The second Previous HitfaultNext Hit system, trending W-E, display both antithetic and synthetic dips. The Previous HitfaultNext Hit traces show a dogleg pattern. It derives from linkage of segmented Previous HitfaultNext Hit Previous HitplanesNext Hit (Laubscher, 1956, Cartwright et al., 1995; Marchal et al., 1998). Longitudinal folds are mainly related to this Previous HitfaultNext Hit system and constitute the most important traps in the Oritupano-Leona area; the production comes mainly from reservoirs located in the upper and middle section of the Oficina Formation. This Previous HitfaultNext Hit system seems to be in relation with the extensional strain resulting from dextral strike-slip movements along the boundary of South-America and Caribbean plates (Elrich and Barrett, 1992).

 

Normal-Drag Folds 

Normal-drag folds are recognized in most of the fields of the Oritupano-Leona Block (Figure 3a). They form anticlines in the footwall of main antithetic faults and synclines in the hanging wall. The hinges of these normal-drag folds are parallel to the Previous HitfaultNext Hit strike. Even though the largest reservoirs of the Oritupano-Leona Block are located in the footwall (Figure 3a), significant hydrocarbon production has come from traps located in the hanging wall (e.g., 41 MMBbls of oil in Oritupano B and 400 MBbls of oil in Oritupano C). In the Leona Field these folds reach their maximum expression.

 

Reverse-Drag Folds 

Reverse-drag folds are well expressed in Leona Field (Figure 3b). They form anticlines in the hanging wall of main faults. A narrow, 10-km long discontinuous belt of fold is defined in the hanging wall of the main Leona Previous HitfaultNext Hit and shows a hinge parallel to the Previous HitfaultNext Hit. Five major folds are identified. They affect the middle section of Oficina formation in areas where the Previous HitfaultNext Hit Previous HitplanesNext Hit change their dips. Several wells have penetrated these folds, confirming their hydrocarbon potential. More than 2.7 MMbbls of oil has been produced from this type of traps. Minor reverse-drag folds have been also observed in Oritupano-Leona area but they have not associated oil production.

 

Composite Fold Structures 

In some fields of Oritupano-Leona area, normal-drag folds are associated to reverse-drag structures in vertical section (e.g., Eastern Leona field, Figure 3c). The superposition of these two kinds of fold is due to local complexity of the Previous HitfaultNext Hit-plane network. The coexistence of both major types of fold associated with normal faulting may lead to the juxtaposition of two traps formed by elongated anticlinal structure on both sides of the Previous HitfaultNext Hit (Figure 3c). In the Leona Field, more than 2.7 MMbbls of light-medium oil has come from the reverse-drag folds. 

The Junta field is made of a composite system of folds (Figure 3d). The secondary features of two interacting Previous HitfaultNext Hit systems make the structural closure of this field: the first is composed of a Previous HitfaultNext Hit zone of left-stepping en echelon Previous HitfaultNext Hit segments striking NE-SW, and the second is represented by a W-E-striking Previous HitfaultNext Hit (Figure 4). Associated with the main Previous HitfaultNext Hit zone (NE-SW) dipping NW is a parallel set of compensation Previous HitfaultNext Hit segments dipping SE. The trap is divided in two parts: the first part is composed of the footwall anticline associated with normal-drag folding on a compensation Previous HitfaultNext Hit segment; the second part is formed by a residual high located in the hanging wall of the main Previous HitfaultNext Hit zone. Located at the relay zone formed by two overlapping normal Previous HitfaultNext Hit segments, this high consists in a residual topography between two synclinal structures due to normal drag folding in the hanging wall of each Previous HitfaultNext Hit segment, which belongs to the NE-SW main Previous HitfaultNext Hit zone (Figure 4). The Junta trap has been drilled by 55 wells and has produced more than 14 MMbbls of oil. 

Minor folding can be also due to ductile deformation in the ramp of a relay zone formed by two overlapping faults. This kind of folding is characterized by structural highs in the overlapped zone. Folds associated with relay ramps, related to segmented en echelon faults, are frequently seen in the Oritupano “A”, “B” and Leona fields.

 

Plastic Flow 

In Adobe field, located in the central part of the area, W-E cross sections have allowed us to identify particular small features, wavy-shaped in the Oficina Formation (Figure 3e). This type of folding could be related to plastic flow deformation, and slumping, as determined by the competence of sediments. This type of structure is rare in the area, and its economic potential has not yet been established.

 

Conclusions 

1. The use of 3D seismic allows the identification of favorable structures, of various scales, for oil trapping. Normal- and reverse-drag folds represent new exploration and re-development opportunities for these mature oil fields. Reverse-drag folds have been successfully drilled in Leona Field. Many gas and oil reservoirs have been discovered in recent years.

2. These types of traps constitute an important economic up-side potential for the Oritupano-Leona Block. Their identification can be used as a critical element for searching for new reservoirs in developed areas.

3. Further detailed studies of Previous HitfaultNext Hit-related folding will lead to a better understanding of the sealing capacity of faults, fluids movements, and reservoir charge in order to improve oil recovery in fields.

 

References 

Azalgara, C., Salas, D., Ibáñez, G., and De Almeida, H., 2000, Trampas de tipo pliegue de arrastre asociado a falla normal en la Fm. Oficina, área Oritupano-Leona, Cuenca Oriental de Venezuela: X Congreso Venezolano de Geofísica.

Cartwright, J.A., Trudgill, B.D., and Mansfield, C.S., 1995, Previous HitFaultNext Hit growth by segment linkage: an explanation for scatter in maximum displacement and trace length data from Canyonlands grabens of SE Utah: Journal of Structural Geology, v. 17, p. 1319-1326.

Erlich, R.N., and Barrett, S.F., 1992, Petroleum geology of the Eastern Venezuela Foreland Basin, in Macqueen, R.W., and Leckie, D.A. (eds.), Foreland Basins and Fold Belts. AAPG Memoir 55, p. 341-362.

González de Juana, C., Iturralde de Arozena, J.M. y Picard Cadillat, X., 1980, Geología de Venezuela y de sus cuencas petrolíferas: Ediciones Foninves, v. 2, 1051 p.

Laubscher H.P., 1956, Structural and seismic deformations along normal faults in the Eastern Venezuelan Basin: Geophysics, v. 21, p. 368-387.

Marchal, D., Guiraud, M., Rives, T and Van Den Driessche, J., 1998, Space and time propagation processes of normal faults, in Jones, G, Fisher, Q.J., and Knipe, R.J. (eds.), Faulting, Previous HitFaultTop Sealing and Fluid Flow in Hydrocarbon Reservoirs: Geological Society, London, Special Publication 147, p. 51-70.

Mencher, E., Fitcher, H.J., Renz, H.H., Wallis, W.E., Renz, H.H., Patterson, J.M., and Robie, R.H., 1953, Geology of Venezuela and its oil fields: AAPG Bulletin, v.37, no. 4, p. 690-777.

Parnaud,  F., Pascual,  J.C., Truskowsky, I., Gallango, O., Pasalacqua, H. and Roure, F., 1995, Petroleum geology of the central part of the Eastern Venezuelan Basin, in Tankard, A.J.; Suárez Soruco, R., and Welsink, H.J. (eds.), Petroleum Basins of South America: AAPG Memoir 62, p. 741-756.

Porras, J., Selva, C., and Díaz, M., 2001, Reverse-drag folds: New structural traps in a mature oil field: Leona Field case study (abstract): AAPG Hedberg Conference.

 

Acknowledgments 

We would like to thank Perez Companc for the permission to publicate this article. We also thank the Oritupano-Leona teams for providing us helpful information from the fields.

Return to top.