--> Reservoir Prediction Based on Geostatistical Inversion by the Facies Trend Model: A Case Study From the Gudian Block, Northeast China
[First Hit]

2019 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition:

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Reservoir Prediction Based on Geostatistical Previous HitInversionNext Hit by the Facies Trend Model: A Case Study From the Gudian Block, Northeast China

Abstract

Abstract Accurate reservoir prediction in the early stage of gas field exploration generally is very difficult because few Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit and well logs Previous HitdataNext Hit are typically available. The uncertainty throughout the reservoir prediction process causes the illusions of the geological interpretation. Using more advanced techniques of the reservoir prediction to improve the credibility of the prediction results is necessary. In order to reduce the uncertainty in the reservoir prediction, we analyzed Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit and well logs Previous HitdataNext Hit from tight reservoirs in the Gudian block of the northeast China, and evaluated the coincidence rate between new and conventional methods. The Shahezi Formation in the Gudian Block of the northeast China is one of the major reservoirs. A slope-type fan deltaic system which shows obvious chaotic Previous HitseismicNext Hit reflections on the Previous HitseismicNext Hit section is deposited in the west of the Shahezi Formation, whereas a braided deltaic system which shows progradational Previous HitseismicNext Hit reflections is deposited in the east of the Shahezi Formation. The conventional model-based Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinversionNext Hit methods are difficult to describe the boundaries of the fan while ensuring the high precision of the braided river prediction. So we added a constraint called the facies trend model to the geostatistical Previous HitinversionNext Hit. The facies trend model is a model that shows the probability of the sedimentary facies on the basis of the stratigraphic framework. First, through core Previous HitdataNext Hit, conventional well logs Previous HitdataNext Hit, FMI Previous HitdataNext Hit, and post-stack Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit, we characterized the boundaries of the fan delta. Secondly, we used well logs Previous HitdataNext Hit to interpret lithology. Meanwhile, we used probability density function (PDF) and variogram to determine the overall trend of lithology Previous HitdataNext Hit distribution in the study area. Then, we use the gravel content and the boundaries of the fan delta to establish a facies trend model. Finally, combining the low-frequency stratigraphic framework model, we used the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to perform the Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinversionNext Hit under the constraints of the facies trend model. The Previous HitinversionNext Hit results are output when the artificial synthetic Previous HitseismicNext Hit trace and the original Previous HitseismicNext Hit trace have the smallest residual. This study implies that geostatistical Previous HitinversionNext Hit by facies trend model is better than conventional Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitinversionNext Hit methods in predicting complex reservoirs which are similar to the Shahezi Formation in the Gudian Block of the northeast China, and reduce the uncertainty of geostatistical Previous HitinversionNext Hit. At the same time, the accuracy of the facies trend model in the process of the geostatistical Previous HitinversionTop directly determines the credibility of reservoir prediction results.