--> Synergy Between Production Of Natural Gas & Warm Water: A Reservoir Modelling Exercise Assessing Recovery Factor Sensitivity
[First Hit]

AAPG European Region, Previous HitGeothermalNext Hit Cross Over Technology Workshop, Part II

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Synergy Between Production Of Natural Gas & Warm Water: A Reservoir Modelling Exercise Assessing Recovery Factor Sensitivity

Abstract

The Netherlands evolves from a net natural gas exporter to being a net importer. With renewable Previous HitenergyNext Hit in The Netherlands still not able to fully replace natural gas as an Previous HitenergyNext Hit source, the Dutch security of Previous HitenergyNext Hit supply is at risk. On local scale, especially for greenhouses, Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit Previous HitenergyNext Hit has proven to be a reliable replacement for natural gas as the primary heat provider. Yet with the ambition of the Dutch government to achieve a 49% CO2 emission reduction in 2030 of which partly is assigned to the realisation of Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit heat production, the maturation of the Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit potential is too low. One of the main causes for this low maturation rate is the financial risk attached to both the exploration and exploitation phases of a Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit project. Synergy between hydrocarbon- and Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit exploitation could improve the aforementioned security of supply and simultaneously reduce financial risks of Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit projects. The positioning of a Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit doublet in the water leg of a gas field (figure 1) potentially extends field life and subsequent earnings from natural gas-production which in turn can be invested in the aligned Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit project(s). This poster presents the results of two case studies, examining synergy at the Roden and Boskoop gas fields, that demonstrates Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit production close to the gas-water contact could delay water breakthrough in the gas well(s), potentially increasing the recovery factor. The magnitude of increase of the recovery factor predominantly depends on the amount of aquifer support. Synergy in a weak aquifer (Boskoop case study) has no significant impact on the recovery factor. However, the addition of an artificial strong aquifer resulted in a 20% increase in recovery factor. Synergy with a moderate aquifer (Roden case study) resulted in a 3.3% increase in recovery factor. Furthermore, although not as strongly, the magnitude of increase relies on positioning of the Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit wells relative to gas producer(s), Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit flow rate and potentially the permeability. The study also demonstrates that gas fields in a late stage of gas production could still benefit from the addition of Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit doublets. It might be too late to achieve the full potential of synergy between gas- and Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit production, but a modest increase in recovery factor can still be expected. The Roden case study showed that a 1.1% increase in recovery factor could be achieved with the instalment of a Previous HitgeothermalNext Hit system at a late stage of gas production.