--> Seismic Stratigraphy Supervised Inversion: Exposing the Internal Features of Ngrayong Formation, East Java Basin
[First Hit]

AAPG Asia Pacific Region, The 4th AAPG/EAGE/MGS Myanmar Oil and Gas Conference:
Myanmar: A Global Oil and Gas Hotspot: Unleashing the Petroleum Systems Potential

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Seismic Stratigraphy Supervised Inversion: Exposing the Internal Features of Ngrayong Formation, East Java Basin

Abstract

The rise and fall of sea level changes during early to late Miocene in East Java Basin consequently influenced the stratigraphic variability and the Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit settings of Ngrayong Formation. Ngrayong Formation as a hydrocarbon prone formation in East Java Basin is a product of a comprehensive variety of Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit environments and a number of sedimentary developments. Three Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit units have been discovered which comprise of the stratigraphic Unit I & II that represent a facies change within the lower regressive part of Ngrayong Formation while Unit III represent upper transgressive part of the cycle and overlies the other two stratigraphic units. The concept of sequence stratigraphy brings the understanding of sedimentology towards knowing both in geometrical and scale of Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit element point of view. Stratigraphical features are well pronounced based on the well and seismic datasets revealing the Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit sequences of the Ngrayong Units. Golf-2 well-data sequence stratigraphy expressed nonetheless three sequences of Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tracts and its stacking patterns, respectively. While Golf-2 and November-3 well-data quite relate the same chronostratigraphic events, November-3 consist less Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract and stacking pattern. The Ngrayong Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit sequence at November-3 comprises relatively thicker highstand Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract and thinner transgressive Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract on the top representing that Ngrayong Formation over Golf-2 and November-3 are positioned at different Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit settings. The well-data sequence stratigraphy quite correlates with the seismic stratigraphy which has been interpreted on each Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tracts are belonging to the regressive-transgressive-regressive sequence of Ngrayong Units. Well-data sequence stratigraphy exposes a relatively thick highstand Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract towards transgressive Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract on the top of Ngrayong Formation. The Ngrayong Formation comprise promising geometry interpretation. The reflection termination of the maximum flooding surface represents the boundary between the lower transgressive Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract and the highstand Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract which act as a downlapping horizon while the transgressive surface represents the boundary between the highstand Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract and the transgressive Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract which act as a toplapping horizon where the transgressive Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract starts to onlap. A clinoform or foresets are apparent in the highstand Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract with a sigmoidal progradational geometry concluding the Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit sequence are draping on low energy stance and indicate a suspension sediment supply. Seismic inversion is supervised by the Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract boundaries to represent the stratigraphical features towards the initial model. Geological derived an initial model represent the base distribution of P-Impedance value which seemingly forms the sigmoidal patterns of the stratigraphy and representing the transgressive Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract which has a relatively lower P-Impedance value towards the highstand Previous HitsystemNext Hit-tract. The seismic inversion resulting the final P-Impedance model with a great disseminated P-Impedance value within the distinctive Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit sequences. The comparison between supervised and unsupervised inverse model quite comprise promising results. The supervised inverse model exhibits each Previous HitdepositionalNext Hit sequence with fashioned pattern P-Impedance value while the unsupervised inverse model lack of detail. Clinoform geometries of Ngrayong Formation are clearly defined whereas conventional inversion framework merely non-unique geometry. The integration between seismic stratigraphy and seismic inversion is a valuable aid to greatly expose interesting internal formation features with a high variability of Previous HitdepositionalTop setting. Our study point-out that a comparable formation characterized by a high stratigraphic variability suggested to follow the similar approach.