[First Hit]

AAPG ACE 2018

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Systematic Lithologic Characterization of Neogene Mass-Transport Deposits, Mississippi Canyon of the Northern Gulf of Mexico, U.S.A.

Abstract

Few publications have attempted systematic lithologic characterization of Mass Transport Deposits (MTD’s), usually as a byproduct of field development. While the principal motivation for further understanding these slope failure deposits are driven by the economics of deep-water hydrocarbon exploration, the geoharzards related risks of tsunamis and shallow gas also provide a stimulus for research. The Mississippi Canyon of the Northern Gulf of Mexico is one of the few basins with the necessary density of Previous HitseismicNext Hit and well data to effectively investigate the variable lithology throughout a MTD–rich continental margin.

The proposed hypothesis evaluates: 1) differences between attached and detached MTDs in the Neogene Northern Gulf of Mexico through Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitanalysisNext Hit, 2) areal variations of MTD external dimensions in relation to depositional age throughout the northeastern and northcentral Gulf of Mexico, and 3) differentiation between sand-prone and shale-prone MTD’s in relation to associated regional structural and depositional trends through integration of well-based information and Previous HitseismicNext Hit characterization.

This study attempts lithologic calibration of MTDs in Pleistocene–Miocene strata of the study area through integration of Previous HitseismicNext Hit observations and lithologic related information extracted from logs, mud logs (cuttings), pressure, and available core data to further constrain the distribution of MTD types, lithology, and geometries throughout the study area. Work is focused in supra-salt basins that have the highest Previous HitseismicNext Hit data quality.

Initial Previous HitseismicNext Hit to well-ties and biostratigraphy underpin the primary stratigraphic framework throughout the survey. Focus of Previous HitanalysisNext Hit nicely constrains an interval between GBDS chronostratigraphic units PS (70 Ky, Late Pleistocene) through PTA, PAB, PL1, PGa to PB1 (4.45 Ma, Early Pliocene). Numerous erosional features and unique internal Previous HitseismicNext Hit anomalies are observed within mapped Previous HitseismicNext Hit packages. Working interpretations reflect a variable of Previous HitseismicNext Hit responses to the presence of sand and shale (constrained by wells) with contrasting geometries of the MTD geobodies. Comparison of different Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitfaciesNext Hit within MTDs can improve understanding of Previous HitseismicNext Hit character and related lithologic Previous HitfaciesTop, while also constraining potential uncertainties related to reservoir quality and seal integrity. This approach can stand as an analog for similar areas with much less well control, such as Mexican part of the Gulf of Mexico deepwater.