--> Models of Shale Gas Content in Open/Closed Shale-Gas Systems Under Geological Conditions
[First Hit]

AAPG ACE 2018

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Models of Previous HitShaleNext Hit Previous HitGasNext Hit Content in Open/Closed Previous HitShaleNext Hit-Previous HitGasNext Hit Systems Under Geological Conditions

Abstract

Estimating Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit content and understanding how it evolves during postgeneration evolution are major challenges to Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit exploration in Southern China. The organic-rich shales in Southern China have experienced intensive uplift and erosion of overburden rock, which results in the present preservation conditions of oil-Previous HitgasNext Hit systems very complicated. However, in previous studies, the geological models of Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit content were all in open Previous HitshaleNext Hit-Previous HitgasNext Hit systems. In this study, based on the adsorption potential theory and SDR isotherm model, equations to calculate the adsorbed Previous HitgasNext Hit content (AGC), free Previous HitgasNext Hit content (FGC) and total Previous HitgasNext Hit content (TGC) are deduced. Then high-pressure methane adsorption isotherms at different temperatures are measured on organic-rich Previous HitshaleNext Hit. The relationships between temperature with adsorption capacity and adsorbed Previous HitgasNext Hit density are applied to calculate the AGC, FGC and TGC under geological conditions. Finally, the models of Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit content in closed/open Previous HitshaleNext Hit-Previous HitgasNext Hit systems during postgeneration uplift and substance are researched. In open Previous HitshaleNext Hit-Previous HitgasNext Hit systems, with the increasing of the burial depth, the dominant influence factor of AGC is the pore pressure at lower burial depth, and then is the temperature at the deeper burial depth. At deep burial depth, AGC almost have no difference under different pore pressure, while the FGC vary in a wide range. Such different effect of pore pressure on AGC and FGC can help us to assess the source of the Previous HitgasNext Hit liberated as Previous HitshaleNext Hit reservoir pressure decreases through on-going production. At shallow burial depth, the total Previous HitgasNext Hit is dominant by adsorbed Previous HitgasNext Hit and the Previous HitshaleNext Hit with higher pore pressure have a higher free Previous HitgasNext Hit ratio. In closed Previous HitshaleNext Hit-Previous HitgasNext Hit systems, it is the mechanism of conversion between adsorbed Previous HitgasNext Hit and free Previous HitgasNext Hit to adjust pore pressure to keep TGC remaining constant. During uplift, although it exists the conversion of free Previous HitgasNext Hit to adsorbed Previous HitgasNext Hit, the FGC are still higher than that of at the equivalent depth in open Previous HitshaleNext Hit-Previous HitgasNext Hit systems, which results in the formation of the overpressure in Previous HitshaleNext Hit reservoir. Similarly, during substance, it is the adsorbed Previous HitgasNext Hit that converts to free Previous HitgasNext Hit and then the abnormal subpressure is formed. The pressure coefficient changes slowly at deeper depth, while changes quickly at shallow depth. Lacking the adsorbed Previous HitgasNext Hit, the pressure coefficient of the conventional reservoir varies quickly than that of the unconventional Previous HitshaleTop reservoir for a same uplift or substance depth.