--> Where's the Data? Acquisition and Processing of Seismic Data in the PNG Highlands
[First Hit]

International Conference & Exhibition

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Where's the Previous HitDataNext Hit? Acquisition and Previous HitProcessingNext Hit of Seismic Previous HitDataNext Hit in the PNG Highlands

Abstract

Seismic exploration in the PNG Highlands poses many challenges both in the acquisition and in the Previous HitprocessingNext Hit of the Previous HitdataNext Hit. The seismic method is limited by both operational and technical constraints. These constraints push established seismic techniques to the very limit of their underlying principles. Operationally the remote location, rugose terrain, weather and Community Affairs issues are several of the numerous factors that make operations both difficult and, at times, dangerous. Technical issues include the complex sub-surface structure, karstified limestone, velocity inversion, and extreme topography. The operational issues and the geophysical effort needed to address the technical issues result in the cost of acquiring seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit being very high, with seismic costing in excess of $200,000 per kilometre. This high acquisition cost makes 3D Previous HitdataNext Hit uneconomic meaning that highly complex 3D structures have to be imaged on 2D Previous HitdataNext Hit only. The seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit acquired in the PNG Highlands is amongst the most difficult in the world to process. A primary reason for this is that the signal-to-noise ratio of the acquired Previous HitdataNext Hit is very poor making many established Previous HitprocessingNext Hit techniques difficult to implement. In order to process the Previous HitdataNext Hit it has been necessary to rethink many conventional approaches and come up with unique and novel ways of Previous HitprocessingNext Hit the Previous HitdataNext Hit. Seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit quality within the Highlands has always been an issue, and on a “non-fold-belt basis” the Previous HitdataNext Hit would be considered of poor quality. The quality of the final processed Previous HitdataNext Hit, although still poor when compared to other areas, has been continuously improved over many years. This paper will look at the various factors that affect the seismic Previous HitdataNext Hit both in acquisition and Previous HitprocessingTop and show how these issues are being addressed in order to produce a subsurface image that is of useable quality to the interpreters and geologists.