--> Time-Lapse Seismic Interpretation Method of Thin Reservoir and Its Application in Monitoring Channel Reservoir of Deep Water in West Africa
[First Hit]

International Conference & Exhibition

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Time-Lapse Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Interpretation Method of Thin Previous HitReservoirNext Hit and Its Application in Previous HitMonitoringNext Hit Channel Previous HitReservoirNext Hit of Deep Water in West Africa

Abstract

Few methods of time-lapse Previous HitseismicNext Hit interpretation are suitable for thin Previous HitreservoirNext Hit Previous HitmonitoringNext Hit. Based on forward modelling, a new method is proposed to analyze changes of thin Previous HitreservoirNext Hit using differential waveform of time-lapse Previous HitseismicNext Hit data. The first phase of this study is modelling acoustic response of thin Previous HitreservoirNext Hit to simulate acoustic impedance changes. Base Previous HitseismicNext Hit data minus Previous HitmonitoringNext Hit Previous HitseismicNext Hit data equals differential data. Simulating results indicate that differential waveform is independent of the initial impedance of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit and surrounding rock and controlled by impedance changes of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit. Increase of acoustic impedance of thin Previous HitreservoirNext Hit leads to positive waveform (wave trough on top of wave crest) and decrease of acoustic impedance of thin Previous HitreservoirNext Hit leads to negative waveform (wave crest on top of wave trough). Amplitude of differential waveform becomes stronger with the increasing of absolute value of impedance change of the thin Previous HitreservoirNext Hit. According to the conclusion above, interpreter can quickly determine whether the impedance of thin Previous HitreservoirNext Hit increase or decrease. Target Previous HitreservoirNext Hit selected for this study is the shallowest of a series of stacked oil pays and any possible effects of production in overlying reservoirs are eliminated. Two 3-D Previous HitseismicNext Hit surveys have been acquired before and after initial production – one in 1998 and the other 2011. Differential Waveform is interpreted as single positive waveform or superposition of positive waveforms within the scope of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit, which indicates the impedance of the thin oil layer increased during water-flooding development. Analysis of production history and logging data interpretation proves the conclusion above. In this study, there is no evidence of degassing. Small changes of pressure and temperature in this Previous HitreservoirNext Hit led to little effect on the velocity and density change of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit. Increase of water saturation caused by water injection led to the positive waveform. Water saturation, porosity, shale content, velocity and density of Previous HitreservoirNext Hit in wells were determined by interpretation of well logs. Velocity and density increase with water saturation when porosity and shale content are fixed. It is estimated that there will be an average of 14 percent of impedance increase of the Previous HitreservoirNext Hit when water saturation varies from 0 to 100 percent. Current oil saturation of Previous HitreservoirTop can be qualitatively estimated according to the amplitude of differential waveform.