--> Abstract: Modeling Production and Prospectivity in the Austin Chalk to Optimize Well Placement, Productivity and Completion Design, by Sean Boerner, Rohit Singh, and Ross Peebles; #90164 (2013)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Abstract

Modeling Previous HitProductionNext Hit and Prospectivity in the Austin Chalk to Optimize Well Placement, Productivity and Completion Design

Sean Boerner, Rohit Singh, and Ross Peebles
Global Geophysical Services

We identify remaining prospectivity in the Austin Chalk within an area of Wilson County, TX by integrating seismic inversion products, post-stack attributes, and publically available historical Previous HitproductionNext Hit data using multivariate statistical analysis. The resulting Previous HitproductionNext Hit prediction volume can then be used to optimize new well placement both laterally and vertically as well as allow for customized completions. By adopting these strategies the operator can avoid perforating and completing unproductive regions along the wellbore length resulting in significant cost savings with a negligible impact on Previous HitproductionNext Hit.

Using 57 post-stack seismic attributes and pre-stack inversion products, correlations can be generated between historical Previous HitproductionNext Hit metrics in the Austin Chalk and extracted seismic attribute values at the well bore. This approach typically identifies a number of attribute volumes that correlate reasonably well with Previous HitproductionNext Hit. Frequently the correlation coefficients for individual attributes would not be considered high enough to represent a sole or definitive indicator of Previous HitproductionNext Hit potential. For this reason we perform multivariate regression analysis on a portfolio of performance indicators combining multiple seismic attributes to produce Previous HitproductionNext Hit prediction volumes that are highly correlated to Previous HitproductionNext Hit. It is important to exercise caution when developing these Previous HitproductionNext Hit prediction models to minimize the number of attributes used in the model. This reduces the possibility of false correlations and of including redundant (co-linear) seismic attributes.

Using Previous HitproductionNext Hit data from 27 vertical wells, we generated several Previous HitproductionNext Hit prediction models using 4-6 variables drawn from post-stack and inversion volumes as well as two directional component angle attributes. These had correlation coefficients ranging from 0.933 to 0.963 with historical Austin Chalk Previous HitproductionNext Hit. We validated the preferred model with a blind test using 17 horizontal wells by extracting the Previous HitproductionNext Hit prediction from the model along the producing interval of the well bore. Through this method of Previous HittestingNext Hit we achieve a correlation coefficient of 0.86 between the predicted and actual horizontal well Previous HitproductionTop.

 

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90164©2013 AAPG Southwest Section Meeting, Fredericksburg, Texas, April 6-10, 2013