--> ABSTRACT: Fault and Top Seal Strength at Nansen Field, East Breaks, Gulf of Mexico, by Nicholson, Andrew J.; Wilkins, Scott ; Contrino, Charles; Termina, Joseph; Hertz, Matthew ; Dembicki, Harry; #90142 (2012)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Previous HitFaultNext Hit and Top Seal Strength at Nansen Field, East Breaks, Gulf of Mexico

Nicholson, Andrew J.*1; Wilkins, Scott 2; Contrino, Charles 2; Termina, Joseph 2; Hertz, Matthew 2; Dembicki, Harry 2
(1) Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX.
(2) Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, The Woodlands, TX.

A trap analysis of a highly faulted Pliocene-Pleistocene turbidite sequence is performed in order to understand the controls on column heights, which range from ~150-2400 ft in 21 reservoir compartments. A kinematically viable structural and Previous HitstratigraphicNext Hit model is generated from an Previous HitinterpretationNext Hit of 3D seismic data, Previous HitstratigraphicNext Hit picks from >25 wells, and systematic petrophysical analysis of well logs to develop a field-wide model of shale volumes. This model forms the framework for analyzing reservoir juxtapositions and estimating Previous HitfaultNext Hit properties in five main reservoirs intervals that are distributed throughout four main Previous HitfaultNext Hit blocks. The field lies above an allochthonous salt-high with a series of steeply-dipping, anti-listric, ESE dipping normal faults that accommodate bending during the formation of a deep mini-basin to the SE. The structurally shallowest blocks are significantly overpressured (>1000 psi) relative to the deeper Previous HitfaultNext Hit blocks, and appear limited by top seal strength as indicated by reservoir pressure data that approach the minimum principal stress and the presence of gas chimneys above the trap crests. Hydrocarbon columns in the deeper Previous HitfaultNext Hit blocks are all Previous HitfaultNext Hit dependent despite being presently active and conductive, as deduced from the associated topographic scarps and pock marks visible on the seafloor. While a few hydrocarbon columns are controlled by self-juxtaposition of reservoir units across faults, most fluid contact depths lie above self-juxtaposition points, indicating Previous HitfaultNext Hit-rock seal capacity has been reached. Secondary migration pathways defined by these weak/leak points appear consistent with hydrocarbon maturity differences inferred from sterane distributions between Previous HitfaultNext Hit blocks. Weak points from these traps, defined as the highest ratios of buoyancy pressure to shale gouge ratio identified along the Previous HitfaultNext Hit, form a maximum Previous HitfaultNext Hit seal capacity envelope that is significantly higher than previously published relations, but appear consistent with laboratory derived data collected from core in this and analogous reservoirs. These results suggest that maximum Previous HitfaultTop seal strength could be erroneously calculated when columns are controlled by self-reservoir juxtaposition leak points or top seal capacity, and highlight the importance of building a viable structural model and performing an integrated trap analysis at early stages of exploration and appraisal.

 

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90142 © 2012 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, April 22-25, 2012, Long Beach, California