--> ABSTRACT: Lessons Learned from the Floyd Shale Play, by Dembicki, Harry; Madren, Jonathan; #90142 (2012)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Lessons Learned from the Floyd Previous HitShaleNext Hit Play

Dembicki, Harry *1; Madren, Jonathan 1
(1) Geological Technology, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Houston, TX.

The Black Warrior Basin’s Floyd Previous HitshaleNext Hit has long been considered a potential Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit play. It is a source rock responsible for conventional oil and Previous HitgasNext Hit production from Mississippian and Pennsylvanian age sands, as well as being the stratigraphic equivalent of the successful Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit plays in the Barnett Previous HitShaleNext Hit (Fort Worth Basin) and the Fayetteville Previous HitShaleNext Hit (Arkoma Basin). There are areas within the basin where the Floyd Previous HitshaleNext Hit is thick enough (up to 200 ft), has a high enough organic matter content (2.0-7.0 % TOC), and has reached a high enough thermal maturity (vitrinite reflectance >1.30 % Ro) to pass the initial screening for a Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit opportunity. But tests of the interval with both vertical and horizontal wells have yet to produce Previous HitgasNext Hit volumes approaching commercial quantities.

To determine what is limiting the deliverability of Previous HitgasNext Hit from the Floyd Previous HitShaleNext Hit, the source rock and reservoir properties were characterized. With respect to kerogen type, organic matter content, thermal maturity, bulk mineralogy, porosity, and permeability, the Floyd compares favorably with successful Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasNext Hit plays. Analysis of core and cuttings samples indicates there is Previous HitgasNext Hit charge, and the monitoring of the well completion process indicated that fractures were opened during reservoir stimulation. So why did the Floyd Previous HitshaleNext Hit fail to produce?

Detailed analysis of core including geochemical testing, porosity and permeability measurement, capillary suction time and Birnell hardness testing, and detailed mineralogical and depositional fabric studies suggest potential fluid sensitivity and/or proppant embedment issues contribute to the lack of production. Other possible contributing factors include formation pressure, wettability, and “seal” issues.

These results are a reminder that a Previous HitgasNext Hit Previous HitshaleNext Hit is not just the source but also the reservoir, and it demonstrates the importance of integrating all data, including reservoir rock properties, when evaluating source rocks as potential Previous HitshaleNext Hit Previous HitgasTop plays.

 

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90142 © 2012 AAPG Annual Convention and Exhibition, April 22-25, 2012, Long Beach, California