[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Previous HitReservoirNext Hit Modeling from Lucapa Field, Angola: Advanced Methods for Complex Previous HitReservoirNext Hit Model Grid Construction

Jay Byers1, Francesca Fazzari2, and Enrique Hung1
1Southern Africa - New Field Development, Chevron International Exploration & Production Company, Houston, TX
2Exploration & Previous HitReservoirNext Hit Previous HitCharacterizationNext Hit Services, Chevron Energy Technology Company, Houston, TX

Lucapa field is a large Miocene-age oil field located in Block 14, Angola. The field was discovered in 2006 with the Lucapa-1 exploration well. Water depths in the field area range from 3000’-6000’. The field is adjacent to the Congo River Canyon and is characterized as a deepwater mid-slope turbiditic channel deposit consisting of reservoirs throughout the Middle Miocene section. Depth to the primary Previous HitreservoirNext Hit is 7000’-8000’ (2000’-4000’ DBML).

Grid-based Previous HitreservoirNext Hit modeling at Lucapa field is challenging due to the following considerations: 1) complex channel and channel element configuration, 2) graben-style Y-faulting, 3) penetration of the grid by salt bodies, and 4) erosion of the grid by near-surface canyon-cutting processes associated with the Congo Canyon.

Channel element layering geometries were driven by detailed Previous HitreservoirNext Hit Previous HitcharacterizationNext Hit methods. Structural modeling of graben-style Y-faulting was achieved through the use of the faulted S-Grid process. It is important that the region of the grid penetrated by the salt dome be identified and considered prior to model layer construction and property propagation. The Miocene Previous HitreservoirNext Hit section of the Lucapa field was eroded by the paleo-Congo River Canyon during Plio-Pleistocene time and had to be identified and removed from the grid prior to any variogram-based Previous HitreservoirNext Hit property distributions.

At the conclusion of the Previous HitreservoirNext Hit model grid construction, several lessons learned included:
1) Involve all potential modeling stakeholders from the beginning of the process to ensure all technical uncertainties and complexities are considered.
2) Ensure constant interaction between static and dynamic modeling personnel to insure that fluid Previous HitflowNext Hit simulation of static grid geometry complexities will be achievable.
3) Establish acceptable levels of balance between Previous HitreservoirTop model realism and simplicity.

AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Cape Town, South Africa 2008 © AAPG Search and Discovery