--> Abstract: Studying the Tuning Effect from AVO Intercept and Gradient Cross-Plots, Using Pre-Stack Wedge Models, by Sbonelo N. Ngcongo; #90082 (2008)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Studying the Tuning Previous HitEffectNext Hit from AVO Intercept and Gradient Cross-Plots, Using Pre-Stack Wedge Models

Sbonelo N. Ngcongo
Geological Sciences, University of Houston/University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

Estimating AVO attributes for thin beds is problematic because of tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit and other factors that affect pre-stack seismic amplitudes. In AVO analysis, two types of tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit need to be considered: tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit due to thickness of the reservoir and offset-dependent tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit due to amplitude variation with offset. Both affect the true AVO expression at an interface and cause the false amplitude variation with offset that is not associated with an individual Previous HitreflectorNext Hit. Offset dependent tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit can be further affected by the differential travel times of adjacent reflections at far offsets. The main purpose of this capstone project is to demonstrate how AVO intercept and gradient are affected by tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit as reservoir thickness is reduced.

This study is performed on six gas sand pre-stack wedge models with realistic reservoir properties and encased by shale. Four models have tops and bases of the same AVO classes. The goal is to produce equal strength and opposite polarity reflections from top and base of wedge. The other two models have different tops and bases of AVO classes. Models are as follows: Class III top-Class II base and Class II top-Class I base. The goal is to produce unequal strength and opposite or same polarity reflections events.

In agreement with previous studies, it is found that the tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit enhances and reduces the AVO intercept (i.e. normal incident amplitudes) and gradient (i.e. AVO effects). It is noted that these two AVO attributes do not tune at the same thicknesses, except for Class I and Class II top-Class I base models. This causes the two attributes to produce different tuning curves when Previous HitplottedNext Hit against CDP number or wedge thickness.

In Class II top-Class I base, as the wedge thins the tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit reduces the intercept and enhances the gradient until a certain thickness. Beyond that thickness the intercept is enhanced and gradient is reduced. It is also found that the tuning Previous HiteffectNext Hit can change the polarity of the AVO gradient for Class III, Class III top -Class II base and Class II top-Class I base responses.
The overall results indicate clearly that the tuning Previous HiteffectTop disturbs the location of the true AVO response on intercept-gradient cross-plots.

AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Cape Town, South Africa 2008 © AAPG Search and Discovery