--> Abstract: The Effects of Seismic Data Conditioning on Pre-Stack Simultaneous Impedance Inversion, by Scott W. Singleton; #90085 (2008)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

The Effects of Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Previous HitDataNext Hit Conditioning on Pre-Stack Simultaneous Impedance Previous HitInversionNext Hit

Scott W. Singleton
Rock Solid Images, Houston, TX

The demands that reservoir characterization place on Previous HitseismicNext Hit Previous HitdataNext Hit far outweigh those of traditional structural interpretation. Because of this, gather conditioning is seen by many as a prerequisite to pre-stack Previous HitinversionNext Hit. This paper discusses three conditioning processes – signal/noise (S/N) improvement, stretch removal, and reflector alignment. It then seeks to document the improvements that these processes achieve in the gathers and in the Previous HitinversionNext Hit. Specifically, the gathers were measured for AVO fit using a 2-term Shuey equation and found to be improved by 20%. A comparison of wavelets extracted from the angle stacks found amplitude and phase spectra to be much more stabilized, even out to the far angle stack. The far angle stack Previous HitseismicNext Hit/synthetic Previous HitinversionNext Hit residuals showed a 40% drop in amplitude and completely different frequency and reflector character. Finally, the AI/SI cross-plot showed a much more compact signature that allowed lithology and pay discrimination. Conversely, the raw Previous HitdataNext Hit cross-plot contained noisy Previous HitdataNext Hit that entered into the area of the polygon where the pay signature lay. Geobodies captured from improperly conditioned Previous HitdataTop are thus (1) inflated in size, and (2) have lower impedances. These errors, in turn, lead to incorrect rock property and reserve estimations.

AAPG Search and Discover Article #90085 © 2008 GCAGS 58th Annual Meeting, Houston, Texas