Integrating
Fault Seal Techniques – Explaining The Duality in
Fault Behaviour
Dee, Stephen J.1, Graham
Yielding2, Herald Ligtenberg3, Steven Losh4,
Amanda Pouwel3, Brett Freeman2, Peter Bretan2
(1) Badley Geoscience Limited, Hundleby, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom (2)
Badley Geoscience Ltd, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom (3) dGB Earth Sciences,
Enschede, Netherlands (4) Cornell University, Ithaca, NY
Analysis of the sealing behaviour of
faults re quires an understanding of the impact of faults on lateral and
vertical fluid movement. Faults act both as migration and accumulation barriers, and as potential migration pathways vertically in
the reservoir section. This duality in fault behaviour, as both barrier and
conduit, is often overlooked in studies of migration and fault seal.
Fault bounded traps in siliciclastic
rocks often depend on capillary seal to retain hydrocarbons. Estimates of
properties such as SGR (shale gouge ratio) made from a static deterministic
model of the reservoir structure and stratigraphy can be used in turn to
estimate the capillary entry pressure of the fault zone and thus be used in
modelling the fill and spill history.
Fluid migration pathway analysis on
seismic data illustrates that this static understanding of reservoir juxtapositions
and fault rock properties is an incomplete model to describe the hydraulic
properties of faults. Faults may act as conduits to fluids, as evidenced by
breached traps, gas chimneys, shallow charged reservoirs and seabed features.
A number of techniques exist for
analysing leak potential of faults, including static deterministic models,
stochastic models of stratigraphy, geomechanical reactivation models, seismic
attribute analysis and neural network processing to reveal fluid movements.
In this paper we compare methodologies on
the well-studied and constrained dataset from South Eugene Island Block 330
Field offshore
AAPG Search and Discover Article #90063©2007 AAPG Annual Convention, Long Beach, California