--> Abstract: Seismic Sensitivity of Vuggy Porosity: Example from Lawyer Canyon Outcrop, New Mexico, by Hongliu Zeng, Fred Wang, Xavier Janson, and Charles Kerans; #90039 (2005)
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Previous HitSeismicNext Hit Sensitivity of Vuggy Porosity: Example from Lawyer Canyon Outcrop, New Mexico

Hongliu Zeng, Fred Wang, Xavier Janson, and Charles Kerans
Bureau of Economic Geology, Jackson School of Geosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

One of the important issues in the characterization and modeling of carbonate reservoir strata that remains to be effectively addressed is the Previous HitseismicNext Hit characterization of touching-vug pore systems and the integration of Previous HitseismicNext Hit information into fluid-flow models. The lower San Andres carbonate sequence exposed in the Lawyer Canyon outcrop, New Mexico, provides an excellent example of ramp-crest grainstones having both interparticle porosity and touching-vug porosity. Using an outcrop-based 3-D lithofacies/porosity geocellular model, we calculated velocity from porosity using a linear relationship and generated 3-D synthetic Previous HitseismicNext Hit models to study Previous HitseismicNext Hit responses to vuggy porosity. Under the assumption that the Previous HitseismicNext Hit P-wave misses all the vuggy porosity and Previous HitseismicNext Hit detects vuggy porosity only by responding to density changes, we created 3-D wedge models by changing vuggy zone thickness and the ratio of interparticle porosity and vuggy porosity within the zone, assuming the same host-rock condition. We then estimated Previous HitseismicNext Hit sensitivity by calculating the vuggy porosity ranges that can be detected reliably from amplitude measured in a noisy data set. Major conclusions are (1) Previous HitseismicNext Hit sensitivity of vuggy porosity is controlled by rock physics, stratal geometry, Previous HitseismicNext Hit frequency, and data quality, (2) a highly vuggy zone behaves similarly to a tight zone seismically, (3) amplitude anomaly created by a 10-ft vuggy zone should be detectable in 60-Hz, fair-quality (S/N=10) Previous HitseismicNext Hit data, and (4) with good well control that reduces the ambiguity in total porosity and thickness estimation, it should be possible to map the vuggy zone by conducting Previous HitseismicTop inversion.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90039©2005 AAPG Calgary, Alberta, June 16-19, 2005