Incorporating Uncertainty into Geological and Flow
Simulation
:
Application to a Pre-Development Field, Offshore West Africa
Andrew W. Harding1, Avi Chakravarty1, and Robert
Scamman2
1 ChevronTexaco Energy Technology Company, San Ramon, CA
2 ChevronTexaco Overseas Petroleum, Bellaire, TX
This is a
reservoir
-modelling case history of a ChevronTexaco-operated
field, Offshore West Africa, designed to evaluate development options. We have
used multiple point geostatistical modelling,
reservoir
-property uncertainty
analysis and design-of-experiments-based flow
simulation
to select a preferred
development option.
The multiple-point geostatistical
simulation
uses a training image, which
is a three-dimensional conceptual model of depositional facies and their
associations. The
simulation
was also conditioned by multiple cases of a facies
probability cube with different combinations and proportions of seven facies.
In modelling the
reservoir
properties, uncertainties in porosity,
permeability and water saturation (“PKS”) were taken into account. Five models
were produced, reflecting the combinations of high- and low-case
reservoir
facies, high- and low-case PKS properties and a mid-case; each was scaled-up and
re-calibrated by adjusting Dykstra-Parsons coefficients.
Twelve development alternatives for the field were defined and
deterministic economics were run to reduce the number of alternatives to be
carried forward into probabilistic analysis to five. The Design of Experiments
(DoE) approach was used to evaluate the key subsurface uncertainties and design
an overall development plan. The probabilistic
simulation
results and Decision
Analysis (DA) allowed us to identify a phased development, which would mitigate
potential downside risks while preserving the ability to capture upside
potential.
AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90039©2005 AAPG Calgary, Alberta, June 16-19, 2005