Abstract: Well
Seismic
Optimization for Field Development, a Case History in Saudi Arabia
ALFARAJ, MOHAMMED, MICHAEL FERGUSON, and AHMED ALMOUSA
Well seismic
profiling
plays a major role complementing the interpretation of
seismic
data. Here,
to help interpret a giant 3D
seismic
survey, a well-
seismic
program was
designed to meet three objectives: to confirm correct picking of a reservoir
top, to identify multiples, and to substantiate the presence of small-throw
faults seen on 3D
seismic
. For the latter, a single-offset acquisition
was decided, where the optimum source distance was inferred by elastic
modeling using geologic information in that field. The ambiguity of the
reservoir top on 3D
seismic
is attributed mainly to low contrast in acoustic
impedance and multiple interference.
Since quite a few wells were
planned to be surveyed with well seismic
, a field experiment was first
conducted at one of the wells in order to ensure optimum acquisition. Two
issues were addressed: 1) the source to use, and 2) the
number
of casing
strings that would still allow recording of good-quality data. Comparing
results from different
sources
, a vibrator was decided for offset acquisition,
and an air gun for zero-offset. As for recording beyond casing, it was
found that data could still be acquired up to three casing strings without
a great loss of signal quality.
Analysis of data revealed that
the reservoir zone on 3D seismic
was heavily contaminated with multiples,
thus obscuring the reservoir top, which was later correctly identified
by relying on well
seismic
. Unlike 3D
seismic
, offset well
seismic
did
not show any faults, therefore advocating the likelihood of those being
absent in that locality.
AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90942©1997 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Vienna, Austria