--> Abstract: Reconnaissance Amplitude Versus Offset Techniques in the Niger Delta, by J. Barton and K. Gullette; #90951 (1996).
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Abstract: Reconnaissance Amplitude Previous HitVersusNext Hit Offset Techniques in the Niger Delta

John Barton, Kenny Gullette

Reconnaissance Previous HitAVONext Hit (amplitude vs. offset) techniques have been invaluable in allowing the analyses and mapping of Previous HitAVONext Hit on large-volume data sets in the Nigerian Niger Delta. Forward modelling of rock properties derived from well data on the shelf and regional ties of common depth point gathers to well control show that a shale on hydrocarbon bearing sand typically generates increasing amplitude with offset [Class 2 and Class 3 type anomalies of the Rutherford and Williams (1989) classification]. Consequently, processing and display techniques have been developed that distinguish the increasing amplitude with offset response associated with hydrocarbon bearing sands from the flatter Previous HitAVONext Hit response of background water wet sands and shales. Attributes are created from angle sta ks rather than by analyses of individual common depth point gathers over an entire data set. We show examples of a new Previous HitAVONext Hit attribute which we call the Enhanced Restricted Previous HitGradientNext Hit that highlights Class 2 and Class 3 type Previous HitAVONext Hit anomalies more clearly than some of the standard Previous HitAVONext Hit attributes used in the industry. The techniques described here provide a cost-effective and practical way of evaluating Previous HitAVOTop character on large volume 2D and 3D data sets and should also be useful in other areas worldwide where hydrocarbon bearing reservoirs generate increasing amplitude with offset.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90951©1996 AAPG International Conference and Exhibition, Caracas, Venezuela