--> Abstract: Stratigraphic and Structural Compartmentalization Observed Within a "Model Turbidite Reservoir," Pennsylvanian Upper Jackfork Formation, Hollywood Quarry, Arkansas, by R. Slatt, D. Jordan, C. Stone, and M. Wilson; #90956 (1995).

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

Abstract: Stratigraphic and Structural Compartmentalization Observed Within a "Model Turbidite Reservoir," Pennsylvanian Upper Jackfork Formation, Hollywood Quarry, Arkansas

R. Slatt, D. Jordan, C. Stone, M. Wilson

Hollywood Quarry is a 600 × 375 ×x 150 ft (200 × 125 × 50m) excavation which provides a window into lower Pennsylvanian Jackfork Formation turbidite stratal architecture along the crest of a faulted anticlinal fold. A variety of turbidite facies are present, including: (a) lenticular, channelized sandstones, pebbly sandstones, and conglomerates within shale, (b) laterally continuous, interbedded thin sandstones and shales, and (c) thicker, laterally continuous shales. The sandstone and shale layers are broken by several strike-slip and reverse faults, with vertical displacements of up to several feet. This combination of facies and structural elements has resulted in a highly compartmentalized stratigraphic interval, both horizontally and vertically, along the anticlinal flexure.

The quarry can be considered analogous to a scaled-down turbidite reservoir. Outcrop gamma-ray logs, measured sections, a fault map, and cross sections provide a database which is analogous to what would be available for a subsurface reservoir. Thus, the quarry provides an ideal outdoor geologic and engineering 'workshop' venue for visualizing the potential complexities of a combination structural-stratigraphic (turbidite) reservoir. Since all forms of compartmentalization are readily visible in the quarry, problems related to management of compartmentalized reservoirs can be discussed and analyzed first-hand while standing in the quarry, within this 'model reservoir'. These problems include: (a) the high degree of stratigraphic and structural complexity that may be encountered, even at close well spacings, (b) uncertainty in well log correlations and log-shape interpretations, (c) variations in volumetric calculations as a function of amount of data available, and (d) potential production problems associated with specific 'field' development plans.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90956©1995 AAPG International Convention and Exposition Meeting, Nice, France