--> Abstract: Influence Of Pore-Throat Morphology On Permeability of A Carbonate Beach Deposit, by D. C. Kopaska-Merkel; #90987 (1993).
[First Hit]

Datapages, Inc.Print this page

KOPASKA-MERKEL, DAVID C., Geological Survey of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL

ABSTRACT: Influence Of Previous HitPoreNext Hit-Previous HitThroatNext Hit Morphology On Permeability of A Carbonate Beach Deposit.

From capillary-pressure data one can estimate _a_ the power to which Previous HitthroatNext Hit "radius" is raised in calculating Previous HitthroatNext Hit volume. _A_ implies Previous HitthroatNext Hit shape: _a_ = 1 for sheetlike throats; 2 for cylindrical throats; and 3 for equant throats. _A_ values << 1 are common, and may correspond to linear throats; modified sheetlike throats in which a constricted region makes the effective bottleneck nearly two dimensional. Linear throats should be common in dolostones dominated by intercrystalline or moldic pores (the latter because they are separated by intercrystalline Previous HitporeNext Hit systems in the "matrix").

A dolomitized carbonate shoreface deposit from the Jurassic Smackover Formation in Silas field, Choctaw county, Alabama, dominated by moldic and secondary intraparticle pores, was studied in order to estimate _a_ values and to relate _a_ to other petrophysical parameters: median Previous HitthroatNext Hit size, 16th and 84th percentile Previous HitthroatNext Hit Previous HitsizesNext Hit, mercury-recovery efficiency, porosity, and permeability. Factor Analysis identified 3 orthogonal factors accounting for 83% of the sample variance. Factor 1 (50% of variance) is a Previous HitthroatNext Hit-size and permeability factor; factor 2 (19%) is a recovery efficiency and porosity factor; factor 3 (14%) is a Previous HitthroatNext Hit shape factor. Previous HitThroatNext Hit shape is independent of other petrophysical variables, and permeability covaries primarily with the Previous HitsizesTop of the larger throats. Samples coring high on factor 1 consist of massive ooid dolograinstone, dominated by molds and secondary intraparticle pores. Samples scoring high on factors 2 and 3 are diverse (massive and laminated coid dolograinstone, laminated coid pellet dolograinstone, and pellet dolograinstone); some include intercrystalline pores.

AAPG Search and Discovery Article #90987©1993 AAPG Annual Convention, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 25-28, 1993.